Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomson, Dale C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T12:45:45Z
dc.date.available2019-09-23T12:45:45Z
dc.date.created2018-06-29 23:06
dc.date.issued1977-04-01
dc.identifieroai:ojs.ejournal.library.mcgill.ca:article/7124
dc.identifierhttp://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7124
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3272
dc.description.abstractMcGill University was created two years before the birth of Queen Victoria and, thus, came into a very different world from that in which it must function today. For most of its history, it was patterned on its senior sister institutions in Great Britain and an Oxbridge training was considered a highly desirable qualification for academic posts. A century and a half after its founding, MeGill's situation is very different. Its British academic tradition has faded before North American and world-wide influences. Within McGill, broader participation in governance by staff and students, and the general trend in modern society towards more complex infra-structures, have contributed to a proliferation of administrative structures and committees.
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherArray
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7124/5063
dc.sourceMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill; Vol 12, No 001 (1977)
dc.titleTHE STATE OF PLANNING AT McGILL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
ge.collectioncode0024-9033
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:14749164
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/14749164
ge.lastmodificationdate2018-06-29 23:06
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149766
ge.oai.repositoryid100447
ge.oai.setnameArticles
ge.oai.setspecMJE:ART
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7124


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record