Contributor(s)
Paris School of Economics (PSE)Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques (PJSE) ; Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1) - École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris) - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) - École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS) - École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC) - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Université Paris-Dauphine
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision (LAMSADE) ; Université Paris-Dauphine - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
PSL Research University (PSL)
University of New South Wales [Sydney]
Keywords
Approval votingBargaining
Partial honesty
Consensual equilibrium
JEL : C.C7.C70
JEL : C.C7.C72
[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01630037Abstract
International audienceIn the Approval Bargaining game, two players bargain over a finite set of alternatives. To this end, each one simultaneously submits a utility function u jointly with a real number α; by doing so she approves the lotteries whose expected utility according to u is at least α. The lottery to be implemented is randomly selected among the most approved ones. We first prove that there is an equilibrium where players truthfully reveal their utility function. We also show that, in any equilibrium, the equilibrium outcome is approved by both players. Finally, every equilibrium is sincere and Pareto efficient as long as both players are partially honest.
Date
2017-07Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:HAL:halshs-01630037v1halshs-01630037
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01630037
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2017.04.002
DOI
: 10.1016/j.geb.2017.04.002ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
: 10.1016/j.geb.2017.04.002