• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • français 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Ouvrir une session
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DSpace
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Parcourir par

Tout DSpaceUnité de recherchePar date de publicationTitreSujetsAuteurCe laboratoirePar date de publicationTitreSujetsAuteurProfilesView

Mon compte

S'identifier

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

The End of Intersubjectivity? : Science, Literature, and Transformative Experiences

  • Admin CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Festl, Michael
Keywords
cultural studies

Métadonnées
Afficher la notice complète
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3388063
Online Access
https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/245398/
Abstract
In a highly recognized paper from 2015 L. A. Paul shaped the notion of transformative experiences. She hereby means experiences so fundamental that one is incapable of assessing ex ante how one's life will be affected by them. Whereas Paul uses this notion to make a (surely laudable) case against Rational-Choice-Theory I argue that the notion has a more profound impact on contemporary philosophy. In particular, it challenges the concept of intersubjectivity which has become central to a number of ethical theories, e. g. pragmatism and Critical Theory. By questioning men's competence for, at least roughly, anticipating how they will perceive future experiences, Paul's research a fortiori questions their competence for understanding how others perceive certain experiences. However, this competence is a necessary condition of any ethically meaningful account of intersubjectivity. I defend the concept of intersubjectivity against the challenge thus sketched and thereby distinguish two approaches for overcoming the challenge: the scientific and the narrative approach. The scientific approach, as I define it, gathers as many facts about the experience as possible. The narrative approach relies on stories about the experience especially as they appear in literature (broadly conceived). I argue that there is overwhelming evidence that the first approach is likely to fail. Moreover I outline why the second approach is likely to succeed whereby the supposition that stories about experiences shape how experiences are perceived will prove essential. Beyond its core argument my paper has two further implications. The one is the insight that, opposed to most philosophical accounts, conceptualizations of intersubjectivity need to start from a concept of narration. The other is that, in line with previous evidence, narration is not an enemy of the sciences but its ally in the wider quest to determine, as closely as possible, how things are (which includes how they are felt).
Date
2015-10-17
Type
Presentation
Identifier
oai:www.alexandria.unisg.ch:245398
Festl, Michael: The End of Intersubjectivity? : Science, Literature, and Transformative Experiences. Literature & Philosophy. International Workshop. St. Gallen, 17 October 2015.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contactez-nous
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.