Why are cultures warlike or peaceful? Test of regality theory on 186 non-industrial societies
Author(s)
Fog, AgnerKeywords
Sociology & anthropologyPolitical science
Politikwissenschaft
Soziologie, Anthropologie
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
General Sociology, Basic Research, General Concepts and History of Sociology, Sociological Theories
Allgemeine Soziologie, Makrosoziologie, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Soziologie
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Theorie
politisches System
Agrargesellschaft
sozialer Konflikt
Gesellschaftsordnung
soziokulturelle Entwicklung
Spieltheorie
politische Struktur
politische Führung
politische Kultur
Sozialstruktur
Sozialordnung
soziokulturelle Faktoren
psychologische Theorie
Kultur
Egalitarismus
sociocultural development
culture
political culture
social conflict
political leadership
psychological theory
egalitarianism
political structure
social order
social structure
theory
sociocultural factors
political system
game theory
agrarian society
39900
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/37263Abstract
Regality theory is a theory saying that people show a preference for strong leadership in times of war or collective danger, but a preference for an egalitarian political system in times of peace andRegality theory is a theory saying that people show a preference for strong leadership in times of war or collective danger, but a preference for an egalitarian political system in times of peace and safety. These psychological preferences in individuals are reflected in the political structure and culture of the society. A society in danger will develop strong nationalism, discipline, strict religiosity, strict sexual morals and perfectionist art. A society in peace will develop in the direction of egalitarianism and tolerance.
 The article is both theoretical and experimental. Regality theory is explained and the theoretical basis of the theory is extended with contributions from evolutionary game theory, biological life history theory and ecological theory.
 The predictions of social-level effects of collective danger are tested by various statistical methods exploring the relationship between intergroup conflict and a number of indicators of social structure and culture in 186 non-industrial societies of the past based on data from Murdock and White's standard cross-cultural sample as well as a subsample based on ethnographic records. It is confirmed that a high level of intergroup conflict is connected with a hierarchical political system, a strict and punitive justice system, a strict religiosity, a high feeling of group identity, strict sexual morals, a higher workload on children, and embellished and perfectionist artistic expressions. Four other predicted effects do not show statistical significance. Intragroup conflict influences sexual morals but not the other cultural variables. It is also found that the level of conflict can be predicted from environmental and technological factors.
 Regality theory is compared with authoritarianism theory and various cultural theories. While some of these theories appear to describe related or identical phenomena, it is found that regality theory is the theory that best predicts the statistical results. Regality theory has important applications in both the natural and the social sciences, including the study of many psychological, political and cultural phenomena.Date
2014-02-17Type
MonographieIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/37263http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/37263
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-372631
Copyright/License
Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine BearbeitungCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Attitudes, ideological associations and the left-right divide in Latin AmericaWiesehomeier, Nina; Doyle, David (DEU, 2012-06-19)Do Latin American citizens share a common conception of the ideological left–right distinction? And if so, is this conception linked to individuals’ ideological self-placement? Selecting questions from the 2006 Latinobarómetro survey based on a core definition of the left–right divide rooted in political theory and philosophy, this paper addresses these questions. We apply joint correspondence analysis to explore whether citizens who relate to the same ideological identification also share similar and coherent convictions and beliefs that reflect the ideological content of the left–right distinction. Our analysis indicates that theoretical conceptions about the roots of, and responsibility for, inequality in society, together with the translation of these beliefs into attitudes regarding the state versus market divide, distinguish those who self-identify with the left and those who self-identify with the right.
-
Führungsgruppen und Massenbewegungen im historischen Vergleich: der Beitrag der Historischen Sozialforschung zu einer diachronen SozialwissenschaftBest, Heinrich (DEU, 2012-02-24)Inhaltsverzeichnis: Wilhelm Heinz Schröder: Heinrich Best: Streiter für die Konvergenz von Geschichte und Soziologie. Reminiszenzen und Reflektionen zur Etablierung der Historischen Sozialforschung (7-48). A. Methodologie, Methoden und Theorie - Quantifizierende historische Sozialforschung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ein Überblick (1981) (49-73); Historische Sozialforschung als Erweiterung der Soziologie. Die Konvergenz historischer und sozialwissenschaftlicher Erkenntniskonzepte (1988) (74-89); Historische Sozialforschung und Soziologie. Reminiszenzen und Reflektionen zum zwanzigsten Jahrestag der Gründung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft QUANTUM (1996) (90-102). B. Struktur und Wandel politischer Eliten - Strategien und Strukturen parlamentarischer Repräsentation einer antiparlamentarischen Partei. Die Reichstagsfraktion der NSDAP 1928-1933 (1997) (103-119); Der langfristige Wandel politischer Eliten in Europa 1867-2000: Auf dem Weg der Konvergenz? (2003) (120-146); Unterschiedliche Wege - gleiches Ziel? Der langfristige Wandel parlamentarischer Repräsentation in Deutschland und Frankreich 1848-2003 (2007) (147-164). C. Gesellschaftsvergleich, Strukturanalyse sozialistischer Gesellschaften und Transitionsforschung - Sozialismus in der DDR: ein Feldexperiment mit paradoxalem Ergebnis (2003) (165-194); Wenn Quantität in Qualität umschlägt: die Prosopographie der DDR-Funktionseliten als ein Beitrag zur Hermeneutik der realsozialistischen Lebenswelt (2004) (195-210); Parteiherrschaft und Kaderpolitik. Ein kollektivbiographisches Portrait der Spitzenkader der SED in den Bezirken Erfurt, Gera und Suhl 1952-1989 (2003) (211-238). D. Regionale Differenzierung, Staatsbildung und nationale Integration - Nationale Verbundenheit und Entfremdung im zweistaatlichen Deutschland: theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde (1990) (239-260); Politischer Regionalismus in Deutschland und Frankreich im intertemporal-interkulturellen Vergleich (1995) (261-286). E. Politische Partizipation und legislatives Verhalten - Organisationsbedingungen und Kommunikationsstrukturen politischer Partizipation im frühindustriellen Deutschland (1982) (287-311); Struktur und Wandel kollektiven politischen Handelns: die handelspolitische Petitionsbewegung 1848/49 (1984) (312-343); Die Genese politischer Konfliktstrukturen: Modelle und Befunde zur Entstehung von Fraktionen und Parteien in West- und Mitteleuropa (1991) (344-359); Eine ökonomische Interpretation der Verfassung? Die Assemblée nationale constituante und die Frankfurter Nationalversammlung im Spannungsfeld sozialökonomischer Interessen (2001) (360-379); Geschichte und Lebensverlauf. Theoretische Modelle und empirische Befunde zur Formierung politischer Generationen in Deutschland des 19. Jahrhunderts (2003) (380-392). Appendix - Curriculum Vitae: Professor Dr. Heinrich Best (393-397).
-
The Weberian foundations of modern elite theory and democratic elitismPakulski, Jan (DEU, 2014-02-20)"Max Weber's portrayal of modern elftes shows clear proximity to 'classical elite theory,' modern 'elite perspective,' and 'democratic elitism.' This portrayal - stressing power concentration in the state apparata, legitimacy of rule, centrality of leadership groups, and the capacity of these groups to form cohesive power actors - anticipates many central themes in the work of contemporary elite theorists, such as John Higley, whose theoretical attention focuses on patterns of elite integration and ruling consensus as the key 'elite variables.' Higley's seminal studier, especially those linking such elite integration and ruling consensus with political outcomes and regime types, combine the classical elite-theoretical heritage with the Weberian 'supplements,' the latter stressing the variable internal structure of 'ruling minorities' that form in modern nation states. The Weberian elite perspective and theoretical model have been substantiated, elaborated and extended in research undertaken by John Higley and his collaborators." (author's abstract)