Author(s)
Yasin, Yasin MohammedKeywords
Sociology & anthropologyInternational relations
Political science
Internationale Beziehungen
Politikwissenschaft
Soziologie, Anthropologie
Kultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologie
internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Cultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literature
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy
Äthiopien
Eritrea
ethnische Beziehungen
ethnische Gruppe
Kolonialismus
Marginalität
Selbstbestimmung
Machtkampf
Region
regionale Entwicklung
regionale Faktoren
Tradition
Konfrontationspolitik
Verwaltung
Widerstand
Handlungsorientierung
Regierung
Gebiet
Gebietshoheit
Ostafrika
Entwicklungsland
Afrika südlich der Sahara
Afrika
Ethiopia
Eritrea
ethnic relations
ethnic group
colonialism
marginality
self-determination
power struggle
region
regional development
regional factors
tradition
policy of confrontation
administration
resistance
action orientation
government
area
territorial sovereignty
East Africa
developing country
Africa South of the Sahara
Africa
deskriptive Studie
empirisch
empirisch-quantitativ
descriptive study
empirical
quantitative empirical
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/35293Abstract
"Wie in vielen Teilen Afrikas haben die kolonialen Grenzziehungen auch in den heutigen Staaten am Horn von Afrika das politische Geschehen wesentlich geprägt. Da die Grenzziehungen ausschließlich auf den Interessen der europäischen Expansionsstaaten beruhten, die den ethnischen Aufbau der Gesellschaften vollkommen ignorierten, wurden gleichartige ethnisch-linguistische Gruppen getrennt und fanden sich in zwei oder mehreren aneinandergrenzenden Staaten wieder. Diese Teilungen, die sowohl die traditionellen Verwaltungen als auch die sozioökonomischen Systeme belasteten, schürten die Konflikte in der Region am Horn von Afrika noch zusätzlich. Das Land des homogenen nomadischen Volkes der Afar wurde zwischen drei Staaten (Äthiopien, Eritrea und Djibouti) aufgeteilt. Im Anschluss an ihren anti-kolonialen Widerstand sahen sich die Afar mit administrativen Gebietsteilungen und einer Marginalisierung durch die zentralen Mächte in diesen drei Staaten konfrontiert. Ihr ein halbes Jahrhundert andauernder Kampf um Selbstbestimmung wurde als Weg hin zu einem unabhängigen Staat begriffen. Doch ist die Bildung eines Staates Afarria oder eines 'Afar-Dreiecks' tatsächlich das endgültige Ziel der politischen Bewegungen der Afar? Was bedeuten Einheit und Selbstbestimmung für sie? Dieser Aufsatz zeichnet den Beginn der modernen politischen Orientierung der Afar und ihren Kampf von der Zeit des europäischen Kolonialismus bis zur Dominierung durch die nationalen Regierungen am Horn von Afrika nach." (Autorenreferat)"Like in many parts of Africa, the colonial map-making has left its deep-seated mark on the political features of present-day states in the Horn of Africa. As the making of the boundaries was entirely based on the vested interest of European expansionists that absolutely ignored the ethnic make-up of societies, similar ethno-linguistic groups were cut up to two or more adjacent states. These divisions, that gravely challenged the traditional administrative as well as socio-economic systems further fuelled conflicts in the Horn region. Among many cases of such tragic partitions, the land of the homogenous nomadic nation of Afar was divided among three states in the African Horn, namely Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti. Subsequent to their anti-colonial resistance, the Afar have faced further intrastate divisions and marginalization enforced by the central powers in the respective states. Their half-a-century old quest of and struggle for self-determination was regarded as paving the way to an independent state. Is creating a nation called Afarria or else the Afar Triangle the ultimate goal of the Afar political movements? What does unity and self-determination mean for the Afar? This paper will discuss the inception of the modern political orientation of the Afar and their struggle from the era of European colonialism to the time of domestic domination." (author's abstract)
Date
2013-08-22Type
ZeitschriftenartikelIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/352930002-0397
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/35293
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-352939
Copyright/License
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine BearbeitungCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Benjamin & Schmitt: uma arqueologia da exceção Benjamin & Schmitt: an archeology of exceptionAnnie Dymetman (CEDEC, 2001-01-01)Situados em pólos opostos da vida ideológica e cultural européia dos anos 20 e 30 do século passado, Walter Benjamin e Carl Schmitt são protagonistas em um complexo jogo de afinidade e repulsa no plano das suas concepções básicas, articuladas em torno do tema do excesso. A autora propõe uma hermenêutica do excesso.<br>Situated at opposed poles of the ideological and cultural life in the twenties and thirties of the last century. Walter Benjamin and Carl Schmitt are protagonists in a complex play of affinity and repulsion on the level of their basic conceptions, which are built around the theme of excess. The author proposes an hermeneutic of excess.
-
Esclarecimento e ofuscação: Adorno & Horkheimer hoje Enlightenment and verblendung: Adorno & Horkheimer todayGabriel Cohn (CEDEC, 1998-01-01)Passado meio século da publicação da Dialética do Esclarecimento de Horkheimer e Adorno, propõe-se uma reflexão sobre o significado dessa obra no seu momento e agora. Para isto sugere-se uma interpretação dos argumentos básicos da sua parte dedicada ao anti-semitismo, especialmente no que concerne à referência dos autores aos "limites do Esclarecimento".<br>Half a century after the publication of Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectics of Enlightenment a reflection is proposed about the meaning of this work at its moment and today. In order to do this an interpretation of the basic arguments of its section on antisemitism is put forward, especially regarding the authors' reference to the "limits of Enlightenment".
-
O direito &#224; vida e a &#233;tica da sa&#250;de The right to life and ethics of healthGiovanni Berlinguer (CEDEC, 1993-08-01)Defendendo ser a saúde uma dimensão relevante para a reflexão ética, pois que afeta a própria vida, o autor advoga o direito à saúde opondo-se a concepções para as quais a demanda por saúde deve ser resolvida pelo mercado. Conjuga sua defesa a uma análise dos óbices existentes à realização de tal direito (dentre eles a mercantilização da medicina) e à indicação de alternativas éticas e práticas.<br>Arguing that health, since it is of importance to life itself, is a relevant aspect of ethical judgement, the author makes out a case for a right to health while rejecting market-based accounts of medical care. The hindrances to the achievement of such right, above all the profit-aimed outlook of medicine, are discussed, and ethical ways of dealing with questions of health are pointed out.