Demokratischer Wandel in Südasien und die Rolle der Regionalmacht Indien
Author(s)
Destradi, SandraContributor(s)
GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-StudienKeywords
Staatsformen und RegierungssystemePolitikwissenschaft
Systems of governments & states
Political science
Politische Reformen
Status und Rolle im internationalen System
Regionale Führungsmacht
Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
Political System, Constitution, Government
Frieden
Indien
Demokratie
Abstimmung
Nepal
Asien
Südasien
Wahl
Friedensprozess
Friedenspolitik
Demokratieverständnis
Einfluss
Entwicklungsland
Demokratisierung
Stabilität
Friedenssicherung
Bhutan
Malediven
Pakistan
Nepal
Pakistan
Asia
peace policy
peacekeeping
Maldives
voting
influence
conception of democracy
peace
Bhutan
peace process
democratization
election
stability
democracy
South Asia
India
developing country
descriptive study
deskriptive Studie
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/27455Abstract
"Das Jahr 2008 brachte tief greifende Veränderungen in der politischen Landschaft Südasiens mit sich: In Nepal fanden freie Wahlen statt und die seit 238 Jahren bestehende Monarchie wurde abgeschafft; auf den Malediven wurde der seit drei Jahrzehnten autokratisch regierende Präsident abgewählt; nach der Einführung demokratischer Reformen wurde Bhutan zur konstitutionellen Monarchie; Pakistan kehrte zu einer zivilen Regierung zurück; und Ende des Jahres fanden in Bangladesch freie Wahlen statt. Die Einflussnahme der Regionalmacht Indien auf den demokratischen Wandel in den Nachbarstaaten fällt jeweils unterschiedlich aus: Indien spielte eine zentrale, wenn auch ambivalente Rolle im Friedens- und Demokratisierungsprozess in Nepal, da mit diesem Land traditionell enge Beziehungen bestehen; in Bhutan und auf den Malediven war Indiens Einfluss auf den demokratischen Reformprozess eher indirekt, während in den Fällen Pakistan und Bangladesch die angespannten Beziehungen eine Einflussnahme unmöglich machten. Indiens vorrangiges regionalpolitisches Ziel lautet Stabilität. Obwohl das indische Establishment ideell Stabilität mit Demokratie verbindet, hat Indien oft autoritäre Regime aufgrund ihrer Stabilität unterstützt. Indien verfolgt keine aktive Politik der Demokratieförderung. Gründe dafür sind Neu- Delhis begrenzte Einflussmöglichkeiten auf einige Nachbarstaaten, die indische Ablehnung des durch die Politik der Regierung Bush belasteten Begriffes 'Demokratieförderung' und Indiens Wunsch, sein Image als 'regionaler Tyrann' zu verbessern. Aufgrund der eingeschränkten Einflussmöglichkeiten auf die Nachbarstaaten gilt Indien zwar als Regionalmacht, aber kaum als regionale Führungsmacht. Indien ist auch nicht in der Lage, die eigenen Ordnungsvorstellungen in der Region durchzusetzen." (Autorenreferat)Date
2011-11-21Type
ArbeitspapierIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/27455http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/27455
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-274559
Copyright/License
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine BearbeitungCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Governance Reform Under Real-World Conditions : Citizens, Stakeholders, and VoiceOdugbemi, Sina; Jacobson, Thomas (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2012-05-29)This book is a contribution to efforts to improve governance systems around the world, particularly in developing countries. It offers a range of innovative approaches and techniques for dealing with the most important nontechnical challenges that prevent many of those efforts from being successful or sustainable. By so doing, the book sets out the groundwork for governance reform initiatives. Its overarching argument is that the development community is not lacking the tools needed for technical solutions to governance challenges. The toolbox is overflowing; best practice manuals in various areas of interest tumble out of seminars and workshops. However, difficulties arise when attempts are made to apply what are often excellent technical solutions under real-world conditions. Human beings, acting either alone or in groups small and large, are not as amenable as are pure numbers. And they cannot be put aside. In other words, in the real world, reforms will not succeed, and they will certainly not be sustained, without the correct alignment of citizens, stakeholders, and voice.
-
Political Alternation as a Restraint on Investing in Influence : Evidence from the Post-Communist TransitionMilanovic, Branko; Horowitz, Shale; Hoff, Karla (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-10)The authors develop and implement a method for measuring the frequency of changes in power among distinct leaders and ideologically distinct parties that is comparable across political systems. The authors find that more frequent alternation in power is associated with the emergence of better governance in post communist countries. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that firms seek durable protection from the state, which implies that expected political alternation is relevant to the decision whether to invest in influence with the governing party or, alternatively, to demand institutions that apply predictable rules, with equality of treatment, regardless of the party in power.
-
Development Strategies : Integrating Governance and GrowthLevy, Brian; Fukuyama, Francis (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-09-02)A frontier challenge for development strategy is to move beyond prescribing optimal economic policies, and instead -- taking a broad view of the interactions between economic, political and social constraints and dynamics -- to identify entry points capable of breaking a low-growth logjam, and initiating a virtuous spiral of cumulative change. The paper lays out four distinctive sequences via which the different dimensions might interact and evolve over time, and provides country-specific illustrations of each. Each sequence is defined by the principal focus of its initial step: 1) State capacity building provides a platform for accelerated growth via improved public sector performance and enhanced credibility for investors; strengthened political institutions and civil society come onto the agenda only over the longer term; 2) Transformational governance has as its entry point the reshaping of a country's political institutions. Accelerated growth could follow, insofar as institutional changes enhance accountability, and reduce the potential for arbitrary discretionary action -- and thereby shift expectations in a positive direction; 3) For 'just enough governance', the initial focus is on growth itself, with the aim of addressing specific capacity and institutional constraints as and when they become binding -- not seeking to anticipate and address in advance all possible institutional constraints; 4) Bottom-up development engages civil society as an entry point for seeking stronger state capacity, lower corruption, better public services, improvements in political institutions more broadly -- and a subsequent unlocking of constraints on growth. The sequences should not be viewed as a technocratic toolkit from which a putative reformer is free to choose. Recognizing that choice is constrained by history, the paper concludes by suggesting an approach for exploring what might the scope for identifying practical ways forward in specific country settings.