Contributor(s)
Mehler, AndreasSeuser, Marcus
GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Afrika-Studien
Keywords
News media, journalism, publishingPolitical science
Politikwissenschaft
Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen
Media Politics, Information Politics, Media Law
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Medienpolitik, Informationspolitik, Medienrecht
press
broadcasting
freedom of opinion
pluralism
media policy
censorship
dictatorship
journalism
freedom of information
Africa
freedom of the press
Meinungsfreiheit
Rundfunk
Pressefreiheit
Diktatur
Informationsfreiheit
Medienpolitik
Journalismus
Presse
Zensur
Afrika
Pluralismus
10800
10500
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/43239Abstract
"Bevor Burundis Präsident Pierre Nkurunziza seine verfassungswidrigen Pläne öffentlich machte, ein drittes Mal für das Präsidentenamt zu kandidieren, erließ er Ende April 2015 erst einmal ein Sendeverbot für den wichtigsten unabhängigen Radiosender Radio Publique Africaine. Als es dann Mitte Mai 2015 zu einem Putschversuch gegen ihn kam, nutzten die Putschisten diesen Sender, um seine Absetzung zu verkünden. Nach dem Scheitern des Putsches wurde der Sender von der Polizei besetzt und schwer beschädigt. Burundi ist kein Einzelfall. Die Meinungsfreiheit in Afrika ist nach einer Periode bescheidener Verbesserungen wieder deutlicher unter Druck, wobei globale Tendenzen eine wichtige Rolle spielen. Der kontinentale Trend in Bezug auf Meinungsfreiheit und andere bürgerliche Freiheiten ist eindeutig negativ. Aber auf subregionaler Ebene gelten unterschiedliche Standards, das Horn von Afrika steht besonders schlecht da. Bürgerkrieg und Terrorbekämpfung vertragen sich schlecht mit Meinungsfreiheit, das zeigt der Blick auf Zentral- und Ostafrika. Autoritäre Herrscher, religiöse Scharfmacher sowie staatliche und nichtstaatliche Gewaltakteure haben gleichermaßen ein Interesse, die veröffentlichte Meinung zu kontrollieren. Weltweit sind autoritäre Ordnungsmodelle auf dem Vormarsch (Russland, China, Islamischer Staat) – und das wird in Afrika rezipiert. Für die stark normativ bestimmte Außenpolitik Deutschlands stellt dieser Umstand ein großes Problem dar. Die Meinungsvielfalt und unabhängige Medien zu fördern, könnte -wie bereits Ende der 1980er Jahre- zu einem schon fast subversiven Unternehmen werden. Zu diskutieren ist, ob es eine Anpassung im Namen von "Realismus" geben sollte oder ob eine wertebasierte Außenpolitik unverzichtbar ist." (Autorenreferat)Date
2015-06-03Type
ArbeitspapierIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/432391862-3603
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/43239
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-432393
Copyright/License
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine BearbeitungCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Governance Reform Under Real-World Conditions : Citizens, Stakeholders, and VoiceOdugbemi, Sina; Jacobson, Thomas (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2012-05-29)This book is a contribution to efforts to improve governance systems around the world, particularly in developing countries. It offers a range of innovative approaches and techniques for dealing with the most important nontechnical challenges that prevent many of those efforts from being successful or sustainable. By so doing, the book sets out the groundwork for governance reform initiatives. Its overarching argument is that the development community is not lacking the tools needed for technical solutions to governance challenges. The toolbox is overflowing; best practice manuals in various areas of interest tumble out of seminars and workshops. However, difficulties arise when attempts are made to apply what are often excellent technical solutions under real-world conditions. Human beings, acting either alone or in groups small and large, are not as amenable as are pure numbers. And they cannot be put aside. In other words, in the real world, reforms will not succeed, and they will certainly not be sustained, without the correct alignment of citizens, stakeholders, and voice.
-
Political Alternation as a Restraint on Investing in Influence : Evidence from the Post-Communist TransitionMilanovic, Branko; Horowitz, Shale; Hoff, Karla (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-10)The authors develop and implement a method for measuring the frequency of changes in power among distinct leaders and ideologically distinct parties that is comparable across political systems. The authors find that more frequent alternation in power is associated with the emergence of better governance in post communist countries. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that firms seek durable protection from the state, which implies that expected political alternation is relevant to the decision whether to invest in influence with the governing party or, alternatively, to demand institutions that apply predictable rules, with equality of treatment, regardless of the party in power.
-
Development Strategies : Integrating Governance and GrowthLevy, Brian; Fukuyama, Francis (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-09-02)A frontier challenge for development strategy is to move beyond prescribing optimal economic policies, and instead -- taking a broad view of the interactions between economic, political and social constraints and dynamics -- to identify entry points capable of breaking a low-growth logjam, and initiating a virtuous spiral of cumulative change. The paper lays out four distinctive sequences via which the different dimensions might interact and evolve over time, and provides country-specific illustrations of each. Each sequence is defined by the principal focus of its initial step: 1) State capacity building provides a platform for accelerated growth via improved public sector performance and enhanced credibility for investors; strengthened political institutions and civil society come onto the agenda only over the longer term; 2) Transformational governance has as its entry point the reshaping of a country's political institutions. Accelerated growth could follow, insofar as institutional changes enhance accountability, and reduce the potential for arbitrary discretionary action -- and thereby shift expectations in a positive direction; 3) For 'just enough governance', the initial focus is on growth itself, with the aim of addressing specific capacity and institutional constraints as and when they become binding -- not seeking to anticipate and address in advance all possible institutional constraints; 4) Bottom-up development engages civil society as an entry point for seeking stronger state capacity, lower corruption, better public services, improvements in political institutions more broadly -- and a subsequent unlocking of constraints on growth. The sequences should not be viewed as a technocratic toolkit from which a putative reformer is free to choose. Recognizing that choice is constrained by history, the paper concludes by suggesting an approach for exploring what might the scope for identifying practical ways forward in specific country settings.