Mitentscheiden oder Mitgestalten: Direkte Demokratie versus Deliberation in lokalen Entscheidungsfindungsprozessen
Keywords
PolitikwissenschaftPolitical science
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
Österreich
Demokratie
politische Partizipation
Entscheidungsfindung
Bürgerbeteiligung
Kommunalpolitik
direkte Demokratie
Austria
democracy
political participation
decision making
citizens' participation
local politics
direct democracy
10500
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54487Abstract
Der Artikel untersucht, wie BürgerInnen auf lokaler Ebene bei umstrittenen Entscheidungsfindungsprozessen in Österreich eingebunden werden und welche Mitgestaltungsmöglichkeiten sich ihnen bieten. Dazu wurden sechs lokale Entscheidungsfindungsprozesse zu umstrittenen Windkraftprojekten in Niederösterreich untersucht. In den jeweiligen Auseinandersetzungen sind kaum Elemente partizipativer oder deliberativer Ansätze und nur ein direktdemokratisches Instrument, Bürgerbefragungen, vorzufinden. Entscheidungsfindungsprozesse sind somit auf der
 lokalen Ebene auf Mitentscheidung und nicht auf Mitgestaltung ausgerichtet. So steht der Wunsch
 nach Akzeptanz der Bevölkerung für bereits im Vorfeld getroffene Entscheidungen im
 Vordergrund, während die gemeinsame Entwicklung eines Windkraftprojekts in der Regel nicht
 vorgesehen ist.This article investigates, how citizens are invited to take part in local decision-finding processes in
 Austria. In order to find out, what type of options are being offered to citizens, we have analyzed six
 fiercely debated decision-finding processes on wind power projects in Lower Austria. We barely found elements of participatory or deliberative approaches and only one single direct democratic
 instrument - referendums without mandatory consequences. Decision-finding processes on the
 local level are therefore mainly directed toward co-decision, and not co-creation. Regularly,
 decision-makers do not want to develop wind power projects together with citizens, but rather
 mobilize acceptance for already made decisions.
Date
2017-11-02Type
ZeitschriftenartikelIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/544871013-1469
http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54487
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54487-3
Copyright/License
Creative Commons - Namensnennung 1.0Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Governance Reform Under Real-World Conditions : Citizens, Stakeholders, and VoiceOdugbemi, Sina; Jacobson, Thomas (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2012-05-29)This book is a contribution to efforts to improve governance systems around the world, particularly in developing countries. It offers a range of innovative approaches and techniques for dealing with the most important nontechnical challenges that prevent many of those efforts from being successful or sustainable. By so doing, the book sets out the groundwork for governance reform initiatives. Its overarching argument is that the development community is not lacking the tools needed for technical solutions to governance challenges. The toolbox is overflowing; best practice manuals in various areas of interest tumble out of seminars and workshops. However, difficulties arise when attempts are made to apply what are often excellent technical solutions under real-world conditions. Human beings, acting either alone or in groups small and large, are not as amenable as are pure numbers. And they cannot be put aside. In other words, in the real world, reforms will not succeed, and they will certainly not be sustained, without the correct alignment of citizens, stakeholders, and voice.
-
Political Alternation as a Restraint on Investing in Influence : Evidence from the Post-Communist TransitionMilanovic, Branko; Horowitz, Shale; Hoff, Karla (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-10)The authors develop and implement a method for measuring the frequency of changes in power among distinct leaders and ideologically distinct parties that is comparable across political systems. The authors find that more frequent alternation in power is associated with the emergence of better governance in post communist countries. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that firms seek durable protection from the state, which implies that expected political alternation is relevant to the decision whether to invest in influence with the governing party or, alternatively, to demand institutions that apply predictable rules, with equality of treatment, regardless of the party in power.
-
Development Strategies : Integrating Governance and GrowthLevy, Brian; Fukuyama, Francis (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-09-02)A frontier challenge for development strategy is to move beyond prescribing optimal economic policies, and instead -- taking a broad view of the interactions between economic, political and social constraints and dynamics -- to identify entry points capable of breaking a low-growth logjam, and initiating a virtuous spiral of cumulative change. The paper lays out four distinctive sequences via which the different dimensions might interact and evolve over time, and provides country-specific illustrations of each. Each sequence is defined by the principal focus of its initial step: 1) State capacity building provides a platform for accelerated growth via improved public sector performance and enhanced credibility for investors; strengthened political institutions and civil society come onto the agenda only over the longer term; 2) Transformational governance has as its entry point the reshaping of a country's political institutions. Accelerated growth could follow, insofar as institutional changes enhance accountability, and reduce the potential for arbitrary discretionary action -- and thereby shift expectations in a positive direction; 3) For 'just enough governance', the initial focus is on growth itself, with the aim of addressing specific capacity and institutional constraints as and when they become binding -- not seeking to anticipate and address in advance all possible institutional constraints; 4) Bottom-up development engages civil society as an entry point for seeking stronger state capacity, lower corruption, better public services, improvements in political institutions more broadly -- and a subsequent unlocking of constraints on growth. The sequences should not be viewed as a technocratic toolkit from which a putative reformer is free to choose. Recognizing that choice is constrained by history, the paper concludes by suggesting an approach for exploring what might the scope for identifying practical ways forward in specific country settings.