ICT and elections in Nigeria: rural dynamics of biometric voting technology adoption
Author(s)
Iwuoha, Victor ChidubemKeywords
PolitikwissenschaftPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen
Soziologie, Anthropologie
Political science
News media, journalism, publishing
Sociology & anthropology
Biometrie
politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur
Medienökonomie, Medientechnik
Entwicklungsländersoziologie, Entwicklungssoziologie
Agrarsoziologie
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
Media Economics, Media Technology
Sociology of Developing Countries, Developmental Sociology
Rural Sociology
Afrika
Nigeria
Kommunikationstechnologie
Technologie
ländlicher Raum
Wahl
Informationstechnologie
Wahlverhalten
Einfluss
Bevölkerung
Wahrnehmung
Öffentlichkeit
Entwicklungsland
Africa
Nigeria
communication technology
technology
rural area
election
information technology
voting behavior
influence
population
perception
the public
developing country
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/afsp/article/download/1159/1166https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61222
https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/afsp/article/view/1159
Abstract
Applications of Information and Communications Technology (ICT)-driven innovations are profound in the electoral cycle. Among them, biometric technology is currently sweeping across developing countries. It is, however, only poorly adopted among rural voters. Does the use of biometric technology in the conduct of elections reconstruct rural voters’ behaviour, amid prevailing social challenges? The links between these realities and their consequences are currently less understood, and lacking in supporting literature. I argue that the public perception of biometric technology, the availability of proper infrastructure, and the distance between polling stations and the dwellings of rural voters all affect the latter's level of adoption of biometric technology. These interactions combine to produce specific modalities that shape voting behaviour and general political culture. I elicit primary data from voters in Nigeria’s remote villages, so as to predict the implications and consequences of glossing over the dimensions and magnitude of the biometric technology adaptation challenge by policymakers. I conclude by reflecting on how these interplays and interactions create "spatial differentials" in electoral outcomes/credibility, and proffer possible strategies for institutional intervention.Die Anwendungen von Innovationen im Bereich der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) sind im Wahlzyklus von großer Bedeutung. Biometrische Technologie erobert derzeit die Entwicklungsländer. Sie wird aber von den Wählern auf dem Land nur schlecht angenommen. Ändert die Nutzung von biometrischer Technologie das Wahlverhalten der Bevölkerung auf dem Land vor dem Hintergrund sozialer Herausforderungen? Der Zusammenhang zwischen diesen Realitäten und ihren Folgen wird in der Literatur noch nicht umfassend behandelt. Der Artikel argumentiert, dass die öffentliche Wahrnehmung der biometrischen Technologie, die Verfügbarkeit einer geeigneten Infrastruktur und die Entfernung zwischen den Wahllokalen und den Siedlungen der Wähler auf dem Land allesamt beeinflussen, inwieweit die ländliche Bevölkerung solche Technologien annimmt. Dieses Zusammenspiel führt zu spezifischen Modalitäten, die das Wahlverhalten und die allgemeine politische Kultur prägen. Ich nutze Primärdaten aus abgelegenen Dörfern in Nigeria, um zu zeigen, wie politische Entscheidungsträger Herausforderungen bei der Anwendung biometrischer Technologien schönreden und welche Folgen dies hat. Abschließend betrachte ich, wie diese Wechselwirkungen und Interaktionen zu "räumlichen Unterschieden" bei Wahlergebnissen/Glaubwürdigkeit führen und biete mögliche Strategien für institutionelle Interventionen an.
Date
2019-02-05Type
ZeitschriftenartikelIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/612221868-6869
https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/afsp/article/download/1159/1166
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61222
https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/afsp/article/view/1159
urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-11597
Copyright/License
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Ist Technikentwicklung steuerbar?Bergstermann, Jörg; Manz, Thomas; Dierkes, Meinolf (Ed. SigmaDEUBerlin, 2016-12-15)
-
Images of Technology in Sociology: Computer as Butterfly and BatJoerges, Bernward (USA, 2017-11-22)Computers begin, without being aware of it, to effect a major turn in social science technology research: machine technology, having been left for a long time to engineers and environmentalists, arouses the interest of sociologists, too. The paper highlights the conceptual advances of a new sociology of technology, which takes seriously the social constructions of technology of computer scientists and computer users. In the context of an emerging "media ecology", the main argument is about a social scientific mystification of Artificial Intelligence technologies.
-
Strengthening China's Technological CapabilityNabeshima, Kaoru; Yusuf, Shahid (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007-08)China is increasing its outlay on
 research and development and seeking to build an innovation
 system that will deliver quick results not just in absorbing
 technology but also in pushing the technological envelope.
 China's spending on R&D rose from 1.1 percent of
 GDP in 2000 to 1.3 percent of GDP in 2005. On a purchasing
 power parity basis, China's research outlay was among
 the world's highest, far greater than that of Brazil,
 India, or Mexico. Chinese firms are active in the fields of
 biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, alternative energy sources,
 and nanotechnology. This surge in spending has been parallel
 by a sharp increase in patent applications in China, with
 the bulk of the patents registered in the areas of
 electronics, information technology, and telecoms. However,
 of the almost 50,000 patents granted in China, nearly
 two-thirds were to nonresidents. This paper considers two
 questions that are especially important for China. First,
 how might China go about accelerating technology
 development? Second, what measures could most
 cost-effectively deliver the desired outcomes? It concludes
 that although the level of financing for R&D is
 certainly important, technological advance is closely keyed
 to absorptive capacity which is a function of the volume and
 quality of talent and the depth as well as the heterogeneity
 of research experience. It is also a function of how
 companies maximize the commercial benefits of research and
 development, and the coordination of research with
 production and marketing.