Author(s)
Ndegwa, Stephen N.Keywords
DECONCENTRATIONLOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS
CAPACITY BUILDING
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
PUBLIC SECTOR
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
FISCAL TRANSFERS
POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
GOVERNANCE
GOVERNMENT ROLES
SERVICE DELIVERY DECENTRALIZATION
ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS
EXPENDITURE
INDICATORS
CIVIL SERVANTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
NATIONAL LEVEL
DEMOCRATIC POLITICS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
CIVIL SERVICE
POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
DONORS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FISCAL CONTROL
DECENTRALIZATION
TRENDS
AUTHORITY
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
FISCAL
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9726Abstract
Decentralization, defined broadly as the transfer of public authority, resources, and personnel from the national level to sub-national jurisdictions, has been a recurrent theme in African countries since independence. In the last decade or so decentralization has gained prominence as an expressed goal or as an actual programmatic pursuit in the context of or as a consequence of two prominent movements affecting the African state. One consists of structural adjustment programs that sought to reform the public sector starting in the 1980s while the other is the ongoing transition toward more democratic and competitive politics. In nearly all African countries, structures of local administration exist but are often subordinated in their legal creation, mandate, and operation to the central state, especially the executive. As elsewhere in the developing world, political and economic liberalization have opened possibilities or at least revived claims for greater decentralization. Major development donors have also pushed decentralization as a pathway to improving governance and service delivery in developing countries.Date
2003-08Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/9726http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9726
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
How Close Is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and DecentralizationIvanyna, Maksym; Shah, Anwar (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-12-11)This paper is intended to provide an assessment of the impact of the silent revolution of the last three decades on moving governments closer to people to establish fair, accountable, incorruptible and responsive governance. To accomplish this, a unique data set is constructed for 182 countries by compiling data from a wide variety of sources to examine success toward decentralized decision making across the globe. An important feature of this data set is that, for comparative purposes, it measures government decision making at the local level rather than at the sub-national levels used in the existing literature. The data are used to rank countries on political, fiscal and administrative dimensions of decentralization and localization. These sub-indexes are aggregated and adjusted for heterogeneity to develop an overall ranking of countries on the closeness of their government to the people. The resulting rankings provide a useful explanation of the Arab Spring and other recent political movements and waves of dissatisfaction with governance around the world.
-
The Political Economy of
 Decentralization Reforms : Implications for Aid EffectivenessSmoke, Paul J.; Kaiser, Kai; Eaton, Kent (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This volume presents a preliminary
 framework designed to help international development
 partners consider the relevance of political economy issues
 for their programmatic support to decentralization and local
 government reform. The intention is neither to advocate
 decentralization in general or in any particular form, nor
 to presume or privilege any particular decentralization
 objective. Instead, the purpose is to document the potential
 value of better understanding how (primarily national and
 intergovernmental) political and institutional dynamics do
 or could affect the scope for realizing decentralization
 reforms aligned with commonly advocated service delivery,
 governance, and poverty reduction goals. The underlying
 premise is that systematic analysis of these issues can
 productively complement the dominantly technical diagnostic
 work typically carried out by development partners.
 Specifically, development partners can benefit from better
 understanding the practical significance of motives that
 drive politicians and bureaucrats to support or oppose
 reform at various stages of the decentralization process,
 from making an initial reform decision to detailed design
 and implementation. In addition, the framework addresses how
 these incentives can weaken, strengthen, or shift in
 response to changes in political and economic conditions
 that arise after reform begins. A general approach to
 conducting political economy of decentralization analysis is
 outlined, recognizing the need to tailor such analysis to
 the particular country context. This volume is based on
 literature reviews and knowledge derived from selected
 country experiences.
-
Decentralization and Governance in the Ghana Health SectorCouttolenc, Bernard F. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012)In recent years, many countries, both developed and developing, have engaged in a process of decentralization of health service delivery and/or other functions of the health system. In most cases, decentralization has been adopted to improve accountability to local population, efficiency in service provision, equity in access and resource distribution, or to increase resource mobilization. Ghana has a long history of local government, going back to pre-independence times of the nineteenth century. By 1859 Municipal Councils were established in the major coastal towns of the then Gold Coast. Native Authorities, Councils and Courts were also established to administer law and order under the indirect authority of the colonial government; the limitations of this system was repeatedly put forward in the 1930s and 1940s, and reforms were introduced in 1951 by the Local Government Ordinance (Ahwoi 2010). The government has embarked in a decentralization policy since independence, which was strengthened and amplified by the local government act of 1993 and other legislations. At the present the Government of Ghana (GOG) is committed to strengthen the implementation of decentralization and for that purpose revise and strengthen the policy and regulatory framework governing decentralization. In spite of this long history and successive waves of decentralization reforms, effective decentralization in the country still faces considerable challenges, especially in large social sectors involving large structures. The public health sector is one that has not fully embraced the decentralization model adopted by the GOG, decentralization by devolution to the districts, for a number of reasons that will be discussed in this report. Some functions and responsibilities have been decentralized, but others remain centralized or simply deconcentrated.