Author(s)
Graham, CarolKeywords
MIDDLE CLASSMEDIAN VOTER
HEALTH OUTCOMES
MEASURES OF POVERTY
WAGE DIFFERENTIALS
INCOME SCALE
LOTTERY
FINANCIAL CRISES
POLITICAL ECONOMY CONSIDERATIONS
INCOME LEVEL
POOR PEOPLE
OPTIMIZATION
NEGATIVE EFFECT
SKILLED LABOR
POVERTY REDUCTION
PER CAPITA INCOME
MARKET PERFORMANCE
COUNTRY DUMMY
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
EXTREME POVERTY
DEVALUATIONS
INCOME GROUPS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
WELL BEING
EMPIRICAL STUDIES
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
EMERGING MARKET
PRIVATE SECTOR
UNEMPLOYMENT RATES
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
GLOBALIZATION
CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISONS
POVERTY LINES
POLICY RESEARCH
VOLATILITY
MARKET ECONOMIES
BENCHMARKS
PRIMARY EDUCATION
DEMOGRAPHIC
INCOMES
FUTURE EARNINGS
RELATIVE INCOME
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
INSURANCE
POVERTY DYNAMICS
JOB INSECURITY
BARGAINING POWER
HIGH INFLATION
INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT PER CAPITA
URBAN WORKERS
UNEMPLOYMENT
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS
SOCIAL MOBILITY
LABOR FORCE
CIVIL WAR
ECONOMIC GROWTH
REGIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT
MACROECONOMIC CONDITIONS
SOCIAL CAPITAL
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
INCOME DIFFERENTIALS
ECONOMIC SITUATION
ECONOMICS
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
AVERAGE INCOME
INCOME INEQUALITY
INCOME GROUP
LOG INCOME
PUBLIC POLICY
HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT GROWTH
CAPITAL MARKETS
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
DEVELOPED ECONOMIES
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
POLICY OBJECTIVE
CROSS-SECTION DATA
INNOVATION
DISTRIBUTIONAL OUTCOMES
NATIONAL SURVEYS
WELL-BEING
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
FREE PRESS
WEALTH
REDISTRIBUTIVE TAXATION
DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
MORTALITY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POSITIVE CORRELATION
INCOME
MARKET ASSETS
PERSONAL INCOME
INCOME MEASURES
ACCOUNTING
SAVINGS
TAXATION
POVERTY HEADCOUNT
NATIONAL INCOME
INCOME DIFFERENCES
POVERTY LINE
MACROECONOMICS
PARTICULAR COUNTRIES
RAPID GROWTH
ECONOMIC POLICY
REMOTE AREAS
INCOME GAINS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
LONGITUDINAL DATA
INCOME DATA
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENTS
GLOBAL MARKETS
GDP PER CAPITA
INDIVIDUAL COUNTRIES
BARGAINING
ECONOMIC REVIEW
FINANCIAL CRISIS
PRIVATIZATION
EQUITY ISSUES
ECONOMIC CRISIS
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
ECONOMIC REFORM
FUTURE PROSPECTS
MEASUREMENT ERROR
NEGATIVE SHOCKS
EARNINGS LEVELS
WELLBEING
PER CAPITA INCOME LEVELS
HUMAN RIGHTS
UNEMPLOYED
GROWTH PERIOD
GDP
NEW MARKET
ECONOMIC STUDIES
DRIVERS
DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES
DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
ECONOMIC PROGRESS
LIFE EXPECTANCY
PRODUCTIVITY
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
MEAN INCOME
LIVING STANDARDS
POOR COUNTRIES
FREE TRADE
ATTRITION
PUBLIC ECONOMICS
INCOME LEVELS
EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES
DIMINISHING RETURNS
LABOR MARKET
NEGATIVE SHOCK
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
INFANT MORTALITY
INEQUALITY
EMPIRICAL WORK
HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT
CROSS-COUNTRY STUDY
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
POLITICAL STABILITY
BOUNDED RATIONALITY
DEMOCRACY
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16402Abstract
The literature on the economics of happiness in developed economies finds discrepancies between reported measures of well-being and income measures. One is the so-called Easterlin paradox: that average happiness levels do not increase as countries grow wealthier. This article explores how that paradox and survey research on reported wellbeing in general can provide insights into the gaps between standard measures of economic development and individual assessments of welfare. Analysis of research on reported wellbeing in Latin America and Russia finds notable discrepancies between respondent assessments of their own wellbeing and income or expenditure based measures. Accepting a wide margin for error in both types of measures, the article posits that taking such discrepancies into account may improve the understanding of development outcomes by providing a broader view on wellbeing than do income or expenditure based measures alone. It suggests particular areas where research on reported well-being has the most potential to contribute. Yet the article also notes that some interpretations of happiness research psychologist set point theory, in particular may be quite limited in their application to development questions and cautions against the direct translation of results of happiness surveys into policy recommendations.Date
2013-12-19Type
Journal ArticleIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16402doi:10.1093/wbro/lki010
World Bank Research Observer
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16402
DOI
10.1093/wbro/lki010Copyright/License
World Bankae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/wbro/lki010
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Rising Income Inequality in China : A Race to the TopLuo, Xubei; Zhu, Nong (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-05-31)Income inequality in China has risen
 rapidly in the past decades across regions, between rural
 and urban sectors, and within provinces. The dynamics of
 divergence across these sub-national areas have taken the
 form of a "race to the top" - meaning that all
 segments of the population, including the poor with low
 education in lagging inland rural areas, have experienced
 gains in average income. The largest gains have been
 registered by those with higher income and education in
 leading coastal urban areas. Using the China Economic,
 Population, Nutrition and Health Survey data of 1989 and
 2004, we show that the most important factors explaining
 overall inequality are differential returns to schooling and
 sector of employment. A decomposition analysis based on
 household income determination shows that the increase in
 returns to education explains two-thirds of income changes
 in urban areas and one-sixth in rural areas. The widening
 income gaps are the consequence of higher growth in leading
 urban and coastal areas and that the skilled population has
 benefited more from the economic reforms carried out during
 the last 25 years. The authors argue that rising income
 inequality can be part of a normal process of development at
 a certain stage, and that the dynamics of spatial income
 divergence in the form of "a race to the top" can
 be desirable to some extent as it unleashes competitive
 pressure and creates incentives for investment in skills.
 Continuing to improve market efficiency and investing in
 people, in particular improving education service in lagging
 areas to poor people, are important for sustainable growth
 and equitable distribution in the long run.
-
Would Freeing Up World Trade Reduce Poverty and Inequality? The Vexed Role of Agricultural DistortionsMartin, Will; Cockburn, John; Anderson, Kym (2012-03-19)Trade policy reforms in recent decades have sharply reduced the distortions that were harming agriculture in developing countries, yet global trade in farm products continues to be far more distorted than trade in nonfarm goods. Those distortions reduce some forms of poverty and inequality but worsen others, so the net effects are unclear without empirical modeling. This paper summarizes a series of new economy-wide global and national empirical studies that focus on the net effects of the remaining distortions to world merchandise trade on poverty and inequality globally and in various developing countries. The global LINKAGE model results suggest that removing those remaining distortions would reduce international inequality, largely by boosting net farm incomes and raising real wages for unskilled workers in developing countries, and would reduce the number of poor people worldwide by 3 percent. The analysis based on the Global Trade Analysis Project model for a sample of 15 countries, and nine stand-alone national case studies, all point to larger reductions in poverty, especially if only the non-poor are subjected to increased income taxation to compensate for the loss of trade tax revenue.
-
Distributions in Motion : Economic Growth, Inequality, and Poverty DynamicsFerreira, Francisco H.G. (2012-03-19)The joint determination of aggregate
 economic growth and distributional change has been studied
 empirically from at least three different perspectives. A
 macroeconomic approach that relies on cross-country data on
 poverty, inequality, and growth rates has generated some
 interesting stylized facts about the correlations between
 these variables, but has not shed much light on the
 underlying determinants. "Meso-" and microeconomic
 approaches have fared somewhat better. The microeconomic
 approach, in particular, builds on the observation that
 growth, changes in poverty, and changes in inequality are
 simply different aggregations of information on the
 incidence of economic growth along the income distribution.
 This paper reviews the evolution of attempts to understand
 the nature of growth incidence curves, from the statistical
 decompositions associated with generalizations of the
 Oaxaca-Blinder method, to more recent efforts to generate
 "economically consistent" counterfactuals, drawing
 on structural, reduced-form, and computable general
 equilibrium models.