Keywords
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONSDECISION-MAKING
OPEN DEVELOPMENT
CAPABILITIES
DECISION MAKING PROCESSES
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
SILOS
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOVERNMENT
CITIZEN
INFORMATION SHARING
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
INSTANT ACCESS
PROGRAMS
END USERS
ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY
POLITICAL REFORMS
POLICY MAKING
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
TRUST IN GOVERNMENT
LITERACY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES
NETWORKS
COLLECTIVE ACTION
ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
PRIVACY
CELL PHONES
CITIZEN FEEDBACK
PUBLIC SERVICES
LICENSES
MOBILE PHONE
POLITICAL SYSTEM
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
GENERAL PUBLIC
DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS
COLLABORATION
TRADITIONAL MEDIA
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
RESULT
DIGITAL DEMOCRACY
TECHNOLOGY TOOLS
MOBILE PHONES
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION
DIGITAL GOVERNMENT
PETTY CORRUPTION
RADIO
ONLINE COMMUNITY
TELECOMMUNICATION
GROUP MEETINGS
ONLINE COMMUNITIES
GOOD GOVERNANCE
GOVERNMENT TO CITIZENS
POLITICAL DEBATE
QUERIES
BUSINESSES
LEARNING
MONITORING TOOL
BROADBAND
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
MEDIA
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES
UNIVERSAL DEFINITION
MATERIAL
DECISION MAKING
COPYRIGHT
CORRUPTION ISSUES
CATALYTIC ROLE
EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION
TRANSPARENCY
KIOSKS
CONNECTIVITY
HUMAN CAPACITIES
CERTIFICATE
LIMITED ACCESS
LOCAL COMMUNITY
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
E-DEMOCRACY
DIGITAL DIVIDE
FLOW OF INFORMATION
CAPABILITY
ICT
ACTIVE PARTICIPATION
GOVERNMENT SERVICE DELIVERY
TELEPHONE
INFORMATION POVERTY
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INSPECTIONS
POLITICAL BARRIERS
YOUTH
INCOME
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
CAPACITY BUILDING
USERS
USER
TRANSACTION
LEGAL SYSTEM
CIVIC LIFE
POLITICAL WILL
SOCIAL CHANGE
TRUST BETWEEN CITIZENS
USES
PARTICIPATORY PLANNING
BUREAUCRACIES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
PHONES
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
HUMAN RIGHTS
E-GOVERNMENT APPLICATIONS
ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGIES
DIGITAL EXCLUSION
REAL-TIME DATA
PRODUCTIVITY
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
DIGITAL AGE
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
NATIONAL SECURITY
NEXT GENERATION
INNOVATIONS
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
OPEN ACCESS
BROADCASTS
SERVICE PROVISION
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
USAGE LEVELS
TIMELY ACCESS
CONTENT CREATION
GOVERNMENT DATA
INFORMATION FLOWS
USE OF INFORMATION
POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
FOREIGN AID
EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT
ADVERTISING
ACCESS TO INFORMATION LAW
DATA COLLECTION
ACCOUNTABILITY
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SOCIAL ACTION
GOVERNMENT SERVICE
RESULTS
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
INSTITUTION
ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES
PUBLIC INFORMATION
OPEN GOVERNMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
SELF-HELP
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
E-GOVERNMENT
CITIZEN INFORMATION
HARDWARE
SERVICE PROVIDER
PHONE CALLS
TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
CELLULAR SERVICE
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
PENETRATION RATE
SERVICE PROVIDERS
INFORMATION SOCIETY
E-READINESS
TELEVISION
PHYSICAL PRESENCE
ELECTIONS
POLITICAL COMMITMENT
CIVIC LEADERS
TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT
CIVIC PARTICIPATION
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20113Abstract
Can information and communication technologies (ICTs) empower through participation, transparency, and accountability and if so, under which conditions? Theory and practice demonstrate that technologies can empower citizens to hold governments and international donors accountable, but true accountability will only result from recognizing the gap between supply (governments, international donors, service providers) and demand (citizens, civil society organizations, communities) and considering how to bridge it from both sides. ICT-enabled initiatives have contributed to shrinking this accountability gap, yet in many cases, it remains open. In this paper, the authors develop a framework for analyzing how technologies can accelerate efforts to close the gap, which the authors call the loch ness model. The authors offer reasons why the gap remains open and put forth recommendations for closing it.Date
2014-09-12Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/20113http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20113
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Proactive TransparencyDarbishire, Helen (2010-09-14)This paper identifies four primary
 drivers of proactive disclosure throughout history. The
 first is the need to inform the public about laws and
 decisions and the public's right to be informed, to
 know their rights and obligations. The second is the
 public's demand for the information needed to hold
 governments accountable both at and between elections. The
 third is the demand for information in order to participate
 actively in decision-making. The fourth is the provision to
 the public of information needed to access government
 services, which has expanded significantly in the past
 decade with growth of electronic access to services or
 'e-government.' This paper attempts to advance the
 debate around that question by analyzing the multiple
 proactive disclosure provisions in national law and
 international treaties in order to identify the emerging
 global consensus on the classes of information which should
 be included in a proactive disclosure regime. The paper
 examines the practical challenges related to the
 implementation of proactive disclosure regimes and some of
 the lessons learned from which principles for making
 proactive disclosure work in practice can be derived. It
 concludes by identifying some future challenges and areas
 where additional research is needed.
-
Punjab Public Management Reform Program : Program for Results Operation, Detailed Technical AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-09-15)This document includes the full Technical Assessment of the Punjab Public Management Reform Program. The Assessment is based on the technical analysis of the Program. It covers: the strategic relevance and technical soundness of the proposed Program; the Program's results framework and monitoring and evaluation; the Program s governance structure and institutional arrangements; and the economic justification of the Program. It also presents an evaluation of the technical risks, and defines the improvements proposed as part of the Program Action Plan.
-
Closing the Feedback Loop : Can Technology Bridge the Accountability Gap?Bailur, Savita; Gigler, Bj??rn-S??ren; Bailur, Savita; Gigler, Bj??rn-S??ren (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2014-05-27)Enhanced transparency, accountability, and government or donor responsiveness to people needs are imperative to achieve better and more sustainable development results on the ground. The rapid spread of new technologies is transforming the daily lives of millions of poor people around the world and has the potential to be a real game changer for development. Improved accountability and responsiveness are critical for reaching the goals of eliminating extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity with a focus on improving the well-being of the most vulnerable and marginalized groups in society. Within the broader political economy context, many questions remain unanswered about the role that new technologies can play to act as an accelerator for closing the accountability gap. Within this context, this report brings together new evidence from leading academics and practitioners on the effects of technology-enabled citizen engagement. The report aims to address the following four main questions: how do new technologies empower communities through participation, transparency, and accountability?; are technologies an accelerator for closing the accountability gap - the space between supply (governments, service providers) and demand (citizens, communities,civil society organizations) that must be bridged for open and collaborative governance?; under what conditions does this occur?; and what are the experiences and lessons learned from existing grassroots innovators and donor-supported citizen engagement and crowdsourcing programs, and how can these programs be replicated or scaled up?. The report presents a theoretical framework about the linkages between new technologies, participation, empowerment, and the improvement of poor people's human well-being based on Amartya Sen's capability approach. The book provides rich case studies about the different factors that influence whether or not information and communication technology (ICT)-enabled citizen engagement programs can improve the delivery and quality of public services to poor communities. The report analyzes in depth both the factors and process of using new technologies to enhance the delivery of primary health services to pregnant women in Karnataka, India, and of several community mapping and crowdsourcing programs in Guinea, Haiti, Kenya, Libya, Sudan, and other countries.