Voice Lessons : Local Government Organizations, Social Organizations, and the Quality of Local Governance
Keywords
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATIONPERCEPTION
AVERAGE LEVEL
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
LEGISLATURE
PARTICIPATORY DECISIONMAKING
DISTRICTS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
BUREAUCRACY
FEMALE HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
SOCIAL FUNDS
USER GROUPS
VILLAGES
LOCAL NONGOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
CITIZEN
PUBLIC SECTOR
EMPOWERMENT
COLLECTIVE ACTION
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
LEGITIMACY
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SOCIAL NETWORKS
POLITICAL LEGITIMACY
SOCIAL VARIABLES
CITIZENS
SOCIAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
HOUSEHOLD DATA
NATIONALISM
SOCIAL PROBLEMS
MOTIVATIONS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
REGIONAL LEGISLATURES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
GROUP ACTIVITIES
GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
FREE PRESS
LOCAL LEVELS
CONSENSUS
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
POLITICAL CHANGE
GOVERNANCE OUTCOMES
DECISION MAKING
SOCIAL CAPITAL INDEX
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
DECENTRALIZATION
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
LOCAL ASSOCIATIONS
GOVERNMENT ACTION
GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS
LEADERSHIP
INCOME
REVERSE CAUSALITY
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES
DECISION-MAKING
HOUSEHOLDS
NEIGHBORHOOD
NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
RESIDENCES
YOUTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION
LOCAL SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
SOCIAL ACTIVITIES
GENERAL ELECTIONS
RURAL AREAS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BENEFICIARY PARTICIPATION
GOVERNANCE
SOCIAL GROUPS
VILLAGE LEVEL FUNCTIONARIES
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19039Abstract
As part the Local Level Institutions study of local life in villages in rural Indonesia information was gathered on sampled household's participation in social activities. We classified the reported activities into four distinct types of social activity: sociability, networks, social organizations, and village government organizations. Respondents were also asked about questions about their village government: whether they were informed about village funds and projects, if they participated in village decisions, if they expressed voice about village problems, and if they thought the village government was responsive to local problems. Several findings emerge regarding the relationship between the social variables and the governance activities. Not surprisingly, an individual household's involvement with the village government organizations tends to increase their own reports of positive voice, participation, and information. In contrast, the data suggest a negative spillover on other households. There is a strong "chilling" effect of one household's participation in village government organizations on the voice, participation, and information of other households in the same village. The net effect of engagement in village government organizations is generally negative, while the net effect of membership in social organizations is more often associated with good governance outcomes. These findings indicate that existing social organizations have a potentially important role to play in enhancing the performance of government institutions in Indonesia and in the evolution of good governance more generally.Date
2014-07-29Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/19039http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19039
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Analyzing Community Responses to HIV and AIDS : Operational Framework and TypologyWodon, Quentin; N'Jie, N'Della; Rodriguez-García, Rosalía; Bonnel, Réne; Olivier, Jill; Pascual, F. Brian (2012-03-19)This paper presents a framework for analyzing the community response to HIV and AIDS. On the basis of a review of the literature, six criteria are proposed for characterizing such community responses: (1) the types of organizations and structures implementing the response, (2) the types of activities or services implemented and the beneficiaries of these, (3) the actors involved in and driving community responses, (4) the contextual factors that influence community responses, (5) the extent of community involvement in the response, and (6) the extent to which community responses involve wider partnerships and collaboration.
-
Kenya - Community Driven Development : Challenges and OpportunitiesWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-08-27)The overall objective of this analytical work is to assess the possibilities for using a community driven development approach in Kenya, to increase formal linkages, downward accountability of service delivery mechanisms, and social inclusiveness in the poverty reduction effort. The report explores relevant policy, and institutional features which color the community driven development (CDD) experience in the country. In the attempt to summarize existing data, and experience on CDD, the focus remains on the various institutional approaches used by different programs. These include a wide spectrum from government and non-government, including a look at the enabling legal, and administrative environment for community mobilization, and civic engagement. Initially, the report provides a background, and introduction to the study, and in analyzing the CDD, aims to inform the Government's the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper process, and the Bank's Country Assistance Strategy. It then reviews major policies which had impacted the present socioeconomic circumstances, and attempts at CDD. This policy analysis mainly focuses on institutional issues, covering interactions between provincial administration, central line ministries, and local government, and service delivery. Recommendations suggest the instutionalisation of villages, empowerment and improvement of local authorities functioning, and, the design of a supportive development administration, options viewed not as mutually exclusive, but designed to provoke stakeholder discussions.
-
Participation, Decentralization and Human RightsFriis-Hansen, Esbern; Kyed, Helene Maria (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-11)This report examines the theoretical and
 practical synergies between three intervention models that
 are currently being employed to improve local governance in
 developing countries: 1) democratic decentralization or
 devolution; 2) community participatory approaches, and; 3)
 rights-based approaches. The aim is to identify the
 possibilities and challenges of an 'integrative
 approach' to local governance that combines the
 strengths of each of the three intervention models. It is
 assumed that an integrative approach can help enhance
 efforts to improve the downward accountability of local
 governments, enhance equity in the distribution of services
 and in various citizens' access to influence, and
 increase citizen participation in local governance
 processes. This is supported by a number of empirical cases
 from Africa, Latin America, Asia and Bosnia-Herzegovina,
 which are presented in the report. Each case also highlights
 a number of context-specific challenges to using an
 integrative approach, such as available financial resources,
 national policy environments and local conflicts. The report
 fills this gap by both identifying theoretical synergies and
 by drawing on the few empirical cases that exist.