Spécialité législative et discrimination : une application inégale des principes républicains dans les colonies françaises (XIXe-XXe siècles)
Author(s)
Girollet, AnneKeywords
[SHS:DROIT] Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Droitégalité politique
religion
territoire militaire
IVe République
nationalité
Code civil
Algérie
colonisation française
établissements de l'Inde
gouverneur
Karikal
départementalisation
spécialité législative
" quatre vieilles " colonies
communes indigènes
Guyane
citoyenneté
administration
communes de plein exercice
indigénat
IIIe République
Mahé
indigènes
assimilation
renonçant
renonciation
Chandernagor
nation
Pondichéry
Martinique
Guadeloupe
statut personnel
Yanaon
IIe République
XXe siècle
XIXe siècle
département
décrets Crémieux
La Réunion
justice
droits locaux
bureaux arabes
naturalisation
droit de vote
commune mixte
territoire civil
égalité civile
[SHS:DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/99/13/92/PDF/Girollet_Colonies_Spec_legis_2014.pdfhttp://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00991392
Abstract
Si les " quatre vieilles " colonies, à savoir, la Martinique, la Guadeloupe, la Guyane et La Réunion, ont été régies dans une logique d'assimilation, les autres ont connu des statuts des plus dérogatoires. La comparaison entre leur régime et celui de l'Algérie et des établissements de l'Inde (Pondichéry, Chandernagor, Yanaon, Karikal, Mahé) est tout à fait révélatrice de la politique coloniale française. En effet, l'État fait le pari de l'assimilation culturelle par une assimilation juridique plus ou moins poussée aux Antilles et à La Réunion, mais il ne le fait pas pour l'Algérie et les établissements de l'Inde. En somme, entend-il intégrer les colonisés ou les contrôler ? Lorsque le statut des colonies et de leurs habitants se rapproche du droit commun, c'est uniquement dans la mesure où ces derniers sont jugés assimilables à la nation française. La IIe République, pourtant jugée assimilationniste, a maintenu, dans certaines colonies, les statuts personnels des indigènes et, dans toutes, le principe de la spécialité législative. Même en 1946, ces deux volets sont maintenus en gardant une volonté de contrôle et une vision paternaliste de l'Hexagone envers ses anciennes colonies qui sont invitées à lui ressembler avant d'obtenir pleinement l'égalité juridique, justification du traitement juridique spécifique de chaque colonie et des colonisés : une logique d'assimilation des colonies limitée par le maintien de la spécialité législative ; un tri sélectif dans l'octroi de la citoyenneté par la catégorisation des Français.Date
2014Type
conference proceedingIdentifier
oai:hal.archives-ouvertes.fr:hal-00991392http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/99/13/92/PDF/Girollet_Colonies_Spec_legis_2014.pdf
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00991392
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Renewal of the Sources of the Law - Study of the Internet LawLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire Droit des Médias et Mutations Sociales ( LID2MS ) ; Aix Marseille Université ( AMU ); Université d'Aix Marseille; Hervé Isar; Barraud , Boris (HAL CCSD, 2016-07-01)Many books studying the sources of the law and many books studying the Internet law have already been published. This thesis differs from these books: it studies the original sources, not only the state law and the customs; and it is a scientific work and not a practical work. Observations of the Internet law can serve thoughts on the currents and futures continuities and changes of the sources of the law. Studying this young and special law is like studying an example of global law and postmodern law, revealing the specifics of the law of tomorrow, when the modern law centered on the state will be replaced by a different law, whose properties gather those of the Internet. Gradually, the conventional sources are substituted by new sources. This thesis wants to be a witness of these changes in the sources of the law.The Internet has changed time and space. It transformed the Earth, humanity, life and society. The law has probably changed too. In terms of positive law, the Internet law only shares some characteristics with the ordinary laws of the twentieth century. In terms of legal science and legal thought, lawyers should perhaps avoid analyzing the law of tomorrow with tools and lessons from yesterday. Studying the Internet law invites to build new tools and frameworks in order to describe and explain as accurately as possible the reality of the law. These problems led to the writing of this book. By focusing on specific legal objects that reflect the twenty-first century law, it wants to promote the understanding and the acceptance of changes in the law. Specifically, the objective is to contribute to the renovation of the sources of the law thought when the modern theory appears increasingly archaic because the number, the identity, the architecture and the balance of the sources is permanently evolving. Firstly, maybe it should now be considered that the distinction between public sources and private sources is the summa divisio of the sources of the law.
-
The sources of the internet lawLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire Droit des Médias et Mutations Sociales (LID2MS) ; Aix Marseille Université (AMU); Université d'Aix Marseille; Hervé Isar; Barraud, Boris (HAL CCSD, 2016-07-01)Many books studying the sources of the law and many books studying the Internet law have already been published. This thesis differs from these books: it studies the original sources, not only the state law and the customs; and it is a scientific work and not a practical work. Observations of the Internet law can serve thoughts on the currents and futures continuities and changes of the sources of the law. Studying this young and special law is like studying an example of global law and postmodern law, revealing the specifics of the law of tomorrow, when the modern law centered on the state will be replaced by a different law, whose properties gather those of the Internet. Gradually, the conventional sources are substituted by new sources. This thesis wants to be a witness of these changes in the sources of the law.The Internet has changed time and space. It transformed the Earth, humanity, life and society. The law has probably changed too. In terms of positive law, the Internet law only shares some characteristics with the ordinary laws of the twentieth century. In terms of legal science and legal thought, lawyers should perhaps avoid analyzing the law of tomorrow with tools and lessons from yesterday. Studying the Internet law invites to build new tools and frameworks in order to describe and explain as accurately as possible the reality of the law. These problems led to the writing of this book. By focusing on specific legal objects that reflect the twenty-first century law, it wants to promote the understanding and the acceptance of changes in the law. Specifically, the objective is to contribute to the renovation of the sources of the law thought when the modern theory appears increasingly archaic because the number, the identity, the architecture and the balance of the sources is permanently evolving. Firstly, maybe it should now be considered that the distinction between public sources and private sources is the summa divisio of the sources of the law.
-
The Renewal of the Sources of the Law - Study of the Internet LawLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire Droit des Médias et Mutations Sociales (LID2MS) ; Aix Marseille Université (AMU); Université d'Aix Marseille; Hervé Isar; Barraud, Boris (HAL CCSD, 2016-07-01)Many books studying the sources of the law and many books studying the Internet law have already been published. This thesis differs from these books: it studies the original sources, not only the state law and the customs; and it is a scientific work and not a practical work. Observations of the Internet law can serve thoughts on the currents and futures continuities and changes of the sources of the law. Studying this young and special law is like studying an example of global law and postmodern law, revealing the specifics of the law of tomorrow, when the modern law centered on the state will be replaced by a different law, whose properties gather those of the Internet. Gradually, the conventional sources are substituted by new sources. This thesis wants to be a witness of these changes in the sources of the law.The Internet has changed time and space. It transformed the Earth, humanity, life and society. The law has probably changed too. In terms of positive law, the Internet law only shares some characteristics with the ordinary laws of the twentieth century. In terms of legal science and legal thought, lawyers should perhaps avoid analyzing the law of tomorrow with tools and lessons from yesterday. Studying the Internet law invites to build new tools and frameworks in order to describe and explain as accurately as possible the reality of the law. These problems led to the writing of this book. By focusing on specific legal objects that reflect the twenty-first century law, it wants to promote the understanding and the acceptance of changes in the law. Specifically, the objective is to contribute to the renovation of the sources of the law thought when the modern theory appears increasingly archaic because the number, the identity, the architecture and the balance of the sources is permanently evolving. Firstly, maybe it should now be considered that the distinction between public sources and private sources is the summa divisio of the sources of the law.