Should Income Inequality Be Reduced and Who Should Benefit? Redistributive Preferences in Europe and Central Asia
Keywords
ECONOMIC CONTRACTIONMACROECONOMICS
EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS
EU
POLICY DECISIONS
RURAL
FAMILY ALLOWANCES
GINI COEFFICIENT
MEDIAN VOTER
ECONOMIC THEORY
INCOME DIFFERENCES
CRIME
RESIDENCE
PUBLIC TRANSFERS
PRIMARY EDUCATION
IRRIGATION
COUNTRY LEVEL
PUBLIC SUPPORT
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
ECONOMIC POLICY
MARITAL STATUS
DROUGHT
PUBLIC GOODS
DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS
HOME
INEQUALITIES
REDUCING INEQUALITY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
POLITICAL SCIENCE
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
INCOME SHOCKS
PENSIONS
PSU
RURAL AREAS
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS
SOCIAL POLICY
MEDIAN VOTER THEOREM
EMPIRICAL STUDIES
SEX
WAR
MEDIAN VOTERS
GENDER
INEQUALITY MEASURE
POLICY OUTCOMES
PUBLIC POLICY
PUBLIC ECONOMICS
TRANSITION ECONOMIES
REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICIES
REDISTRIBUTIVE TAXATION
INEQUALITY AVERSION
REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICY
MARKET FAILURES
SOCIAL SAFETY
POOR
RELATIVE INCOME
SOCIAL JUSTICE
INCOME SCALE
INCOME
HIGH INCOME INEQUALITY
INCOME INEQUALITY
GDP
CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
FAMILIES
WORKING POOR
POLITICAL ECONOMY
FINANCIAL CRISIS
WILL
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
RISK AVERSION
POLICY RESEARCH
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
NEGATIVE EFFECT
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
CORRUPTION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
COUNTRY DUMMIES
SOCIAL TRANSFERS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
POSITIVE RELATIONSHIP
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
SOCIAL MOBILITY
INCOMES
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
ECONOMIC REVIEW
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20619Abstract
This paper examines support for reducing inequality and for income redistribution to specific groups in Europe and Central Asia. The paper uses the Life in Transition Survey to analyze cross-country differences in redistributive preferences and the determinants of individual-level differences in such preferences. The analysis tests for various possible motivations, such as self-interest, beliefs about the fairness of the income-generating process, past social mobility experience, or expectations of future social mobility. Fewer people wanted to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor in 2010 than in 2006 in transition countries. Support for redistribution toward specific groups is highest for the disabled and the elderly, but there is high heterogeneity across countries in support for various redistributive policies, as well as in the alignment between average beliefs and actual policies. The empirical analysis confirms the importance of beliefs about fairness in influencing redistributive preferences, together with self-interest and past and expected social mobility in European Union member states (Western European and new member states), but only to a limited extent in the non-European Union member state group of transition countries. Regarding redistribution to specific groups, self-interest appears to be an important motivation for support for the elderly and families with children, whereas values and beliefs are important drivers of support for the working poor and the unemployed. Although framing matters, the results are broadly robust to alternative measures of support for reducing inequality.Date
2014-12-03Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/20619http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20619
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Inequality in Latin America : Determinants and ConsequencesLopez, J. Humberto; Perry, Guillermo (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-05-24)Latin America is together with Sub-Saharan Africa the most unequal region of the world. This paper documents recent inequality trends in the Latin American region, going beyond traditional measures of income inequality. The paper also reviews some of the explanations that have been put forward to understand the current situation, and discusses why reducing income inequality should be an important policy priority. In particular, the authors discuss channels through which inequality can affect growth and output volatility. On the whole, the analysis suggests a two-pronged approach to reduce inequality in the region that combines policies aimed at improving the distribution of assets (especially education) with elements aimed at improving the capacity of the state to redistribute income through taxes and transfers.
-
Party Age and Party Color : New Results on the Political Economy of Redistribution and InequalityMilanovic, Branko; Keefer, Philip (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-12)This paper advances research on
 inequality with unique, new data on income distribution in
 61 countries, including 20 Latin American countries, to
 explore the effects of political parties on redistribution.
 First, consistent with a central -- but still contested --
 assumption of the political economy literature, left-wing
 governments redistribute more. In addition, consistent with
 recent research on the importance of party organization and
 the organizational differences between younger and older
 parties, older left-wing parties are more likely to
 internalize the long-run costs of redistribution and to be
 more credible in their commitment to redistribution, leading
 them to redistribute less. With entirely different data, the
 paper also provides evidence on mechanisms: left-wing
 governments not only redistribute more, they tax more; older
 left-wing parties, though, tax less than younger ones.
-
Measuring Inequality of Opportunities in Latin America and the CaribbeanMolinas Vega, Jose R.; Ferreira, Francisco H. G.; Saavedra Chanduvi, Jaime; Paes de Barros, Ricardo (World Bank, 2009)Over the past decade, faster growth and smarter social policy have reversed the trend in Latin America's poverty. Too slowly and insufficiently, but undeniably, the percentage of Latinos who are poor has at long last begun to fall. This has shifted the political and policy debates from poverty toward inequality, something to be expected in a region that exhibits the world's most regressive distribution of development outcomes such as income, land ownership, and educational achievement. This book is a breakthrough in the measurement of human opportunity. It builds sophisticated formulas to answer a rather simple question: how much influence do personal circumstances have on the access that children get to the basic services that are necessary for a productive life? Needless to say, producing a methodology to measure human opportunity, and applying it across countries in one region, is just a first step. On the one hand, technical discussions and scientific vetting will continue, and refinements will surely follow. On the other, applying the new tool to a single country will allow for adjustments that make the findings much more useful to its policy realities. And fascinating comparative lessons could be learned by measuring human opportunity in developed countries across, say, the states of the United States or the nations of Europe. But the main message this book delivers remains a powerful one: it is possible to make equity a central purpose, if not the very definition, of development. That is, perhaps, it's most important contribution.