Author(s)
Lamparello, AdamKeywords
Citizens DisunitedMcCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014)
FEC
First Amendment
Election Law
First Amendment
Law
Law and Politics
Supreme Court of the United States
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol90/iss5/4http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11178&context=ilj
Abstract
The wealthy are democracy’s darlings, the middle class are its stepchildren, and the poor are its orphans. Corporate giants line the pockets of senatorial candidates—and purchase influence—while average citizens walk into a polling station and cast a largely symbolic vote. Stated simply, money creates a soft inequality by dominating the political process. Like the “soft bigotry of low expectations,”69 the soft inequality embedded in our political system has created a liberty gap between the prosperous and the poor. McCutcheon was an opportunity to bridge this gap. Instead, the Court enshrined the status quo by holding that Congress could only regulate against quid pro quo corruption or its appearance. In so doing, McCutcheon ensures that many voices will remain silent.Date
2015-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:www.repository.law.indiana.edu:ilj-11178http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol90/iss5/4
http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11178&context=ilj