• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Elections and Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Elections and Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

The Curious Case of the Journal Manuscript Market: Ethics Versus Efficiency in Academe

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Koch, James
Cebula, Richard
Keywords
D40 - General
D42 - Monopoly
D47 - Market Design
D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/348252
Online Access
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/51991/1/MPRA_paper_51991.pdf
Abstract
This study argues that there is a formal market for journal manuscript articles. The traits of this market for nearly all disciplines, except law, are then described. We discuss how most disciplines permit a manuscript to be submitted to only one journal at a time, the role of submission fees in this market, and the costs and benefits of the current system. This system is then compared to a world in which manuscripts could be submitted simultaneously to multiple journals and the potential benefits and costs of such a system.
Date
1981-02-04
Type
MPRA Paper
Identifier
oai::51991
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/51991/1/MPRA_paper_51991.pdf
Koch, James and Cebula, Richard (1981): The Curious Case of the Journal Manuscript Market: Ethics Versus Efficiency in Academe. Published in: The American Economist , Vol. 26, No. 1 (18 April 1982): pp. 30-34.
Collections
Elections and Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.