Establishing mutual understanding in interaction: An analysis of conversational repair in psychiatric consultations
Author(s)I. Hassan; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London
Rose McCabe; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London
P.G.T. Healey; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London
S. Priebe; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London
Myrofora Themistocleous; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London
N. Rees; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London
KeywordsPsychiatry; Communication Studies
Psychiatry; RC435-571; Interpersonal Communication; P94.7
professional-patient communication;schizophrenia; repair; satisfaction; therapeutic relationship mutual understanding
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractThe therapeutic relationship is the greatest predictor of treatment outcome, yet its relationship to communication is largely unevaluated. This study explored how psychiatrists and people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia establish mutual understanding in naturalistic communication, and associations with the therapeutic relationship, patient satisfaction and symptoms. In conversation analysis, the concept of repair focuses on how participants in interaction create mutual understanding and address misunderstanding. A standardized protocol measuring the frequency of repair was applied to 15 outpatient consultations. Correlations between repair and the therapeutic relationship, patients’ experience of the consultation and symptoms were explored. Patients made most effort to make their contribution understandable, whereas psychiatrists made most effort to repair misunderstandings. The more positively psychiatrists rated the relationship, the more effort they made to understand patients. Although psychiatrists’ efforts were not associated with patients’ overall view of the relationship, patients felt better emotionally, despite, feeling less understood. Psychiatrists used fewer repairs when patients were more symptomatic. Both parties prioritized understanding similar topics but psychiatrists focused more on medication and patients on voices. Quantifying repair offers a new way of analyzing how mutual understanding is established in interaction, and links communication processes with treatment outcomes.
Typecase studies; outpatient consultations
Copyright/LicenseThe editors will not consider manuscripts which are under consideration by other publishers. It is assumed that once you have submitted an article to this journal, it will not be sent to other publishers until a decision about inclusion has been made. Only by special arrangement will the editors consider previously published material. Full details of our conditions related to copyright can be found by clicking here. Click Here for the contributor contract, which you should print, sign and post back to us once your manuscript is accepted.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
‘These psychiatrists rate themselves as gods’: Disengagement and engagement discourses of people living with severe mental illnessJay Watts; City University, London, UK; Stefan Priebe; Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, UK; Mike Chase; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK; Alan Costall; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK; Jörg Zinken; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK (Equinox Publishing Ltd, 2010-10-23)Positioning analysis, a variant of discourse analysis, was used to explore the narratives of 40 psychiatric patients (11 females and 29 males; mean age = 40 years) who had manifest difficulties with engagement with statutory mental health services. Positioning analysis is a qualitative method that captures how people linguistically position the roles and identities of themselves and others in their day-to-day lives and narratives. The language of disengagement incorporated the passive positioning of self in relation to their lives and treatment through the use of metaphor, the passive voice and them and us attribution, while the discourse of engagement incorporated more active positioning of self, achieved through the use of the personal pronoun we and metaphoric references to balanced relationships. The findings corroborate previous thematic analysis that highlighted the importance of identity and agency in the ‘making or breaking’ of therapeutic relationships (Priebe et al. 2005). Implications are discussed in relation to how positioning analysis may help signal and emphasize important life and therapeutic experiences in spoken narratives as well as clinical consultations.
Comment une expérience innovante de psychiatrie citoyenne est devenue un centre OMS de référence pour la santé mentale dans la communautéRoelandt, Jean-Luc (2016)Au début des années 70, un secteur psychiatrique de l’hôpital d’Armentières1 a commencé à changer radicalement son paradigme de soins. En trois décennies, il est passé de l’asile à la cité, de l’hospitalisation psychiatrique comme seule réponse de soins, à l’intégration des soins dans la communauté et au service à la personne via des equipes mobiles. Cela a été possible grâce à l’implication systématique des élus locaux, et au fondement théorico-pratique de la citoyenneté pour tous, conceptualisé sous le nom de psychiatrie citoyenne. En 2001, cette expérience a été reconnue comme pilote de l’évolution des soins psychiatrique par l’Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS), et l’EPSM Lille-Métropole est devenu le siège du Centre collaborateur de l’OMS pour la recherche et la formation en santé mentale (CCOMS, Lille, France). Nous présentons dans cet article les recherches-actions que mène le centre depuis 20 ans et la manière dont il a pu influencer les politiques de santé mentale au niveau national et international.
Better Outcomes through Health Reforms in the Russian Federation : The Challenge in 2008 and BeyondMarquez, Patricio V. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-02)The purpose of this discussion paper is
to discuss selected health challenges in the Russian
Federation, focusing on outcomes, expenditures and options
for policy and institutional reforms in the health care
system. The areas covered in the paper draw on recent
studies and reports, and take into account lessons derived
from the implementation of the World Bank-funded Health
Reform Implementation Project (HRIP) at the federal level
and in the Chuvash Republic and the Voronezh Oblast-the
pilot regions of the project, over the 2005-2007 period.