A controlled study of the effects of patient information-elicitation style on clinician information-giving
Author(s)Elisabeth H. Sandberg; Suffolk University, Boston, MA, USA
Warren S. Sandberg; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Debika Paul; Community Healthlink, Worcester MA, USA
KeywordsCommumication Studies; P87-96; Discourse Studies; P302-302.87
physician–patient communication; simulated medical consultation; memory; patient questions; medical education; patient teaching; patient characteristics
communication in medicine
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractAlthough effective communication improves the quality of the relationships between patients and medical clinicians, resulting in better outcomes for patients, little is known about how patients influence that communication. Using a controlled, repeated measures design we investigated the role that patient questionasking plays in shaping the communication behaviors of health care providers. Medical students participated in simulated medical consultations with confederate patients adopting different information–elicitation styles. We examined the effects of passive, neutral, and highly-assertive questioning on the quantity of information delivered. Passive patients, who asked no questions and avoided eye contact, received less information (95.4 ± 27.4 discrete items) than neutral patients (122.6 ± 33.0 items). Highly-assertive patients, who engaged in active question-asking, sustained eye contact and used positive body language received the most information (135.6 ± 46.9 items). The greater quantity of information given to highly-assertive patients was not accounted for solely by answers to questions. The increased information delivery elicited by highly-assertive patients is especially important when considered in light of memory limitations.
Copyright/LicenseThe editors will not consider manuscripts which are under consideration by other publishers. It is assumed that once you have submitted an article to this journal, it will not be sent to other publishers until a decision about inclusion has been made. Only by special arrangement will the editors consider previously published material. Full details of our conditions related to copyright can be found by clicking here. Click Here for the contributor contract, which you should print, sign and post back to us once your manuscript is accepted.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
“What Is PER?” Patient Engagement in Research as a HitBélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe; Del Grande, Claudio; Rouleau, Geneviève (Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalÉrudit, 2018)Engaging patients in research conduct and agenda setting is increasingly considered as an ethical imperative, and a way to transcend views of patients as passive subjects by fostering their empowerment. However, patient engagement in research (PER) is still an emerging approach with debated definitional and operational frameworks. This song addresses the sometimes difficult encounter and elusive mutual understanding between researchers and patients. “What is PER?” is an impressionistic illustration of the challenges and issues that can be found in the universe of patient engagement in research.
Metabolic therapeutics in angina pectoris: history revisited with perhexiline.Inglis, S; Stewart, S (2012-02-02)The ever-increasing burden of ischaemic heart disease and its common manifestation chronic angina pectoris calls for the exploration of other treatment options for those patients who despite the maximum conventional pharmacological and surgical interventions continue to suffer. Such exploration has led to the increasing use of new metabolically acting antianginal agents and the re-emergence of an old and somewhat forgotten pharmacological agent, perhexiline maleate. This review aims to update the cardiac nurse with knowledge to manage the care a patient receiving perhexiline maleate treatment and provide a brief review of three new metabolic agents: trimetazidine, ranolazine and etomoxir.