Author(s)
Dreyer, JohannKeywords
ConversationsStudents
Unisa
Open Distance Learning (ODL)
Higher Education (HE)
Teaching
Learning
Study materials
Student-student interactions
Student-lecturer interactions
Learning Management System
E-mails
Letters
Faxes
SMS’s
Whatsapp messages
Home phone and cellular calls
Appointments
Skype conversations
Conversations at workshops and school visits
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/22481Abstract
Interaction with students in Open Distance Learning (ODL) in Higher Education (HE) has been researched extensively as it is widely recognised as a crucial element of teaching and learning in such institutions. ODL in HE institutions are often blamed for lack of and bad communication with students. What is usually understood as interaction with students is student-study materials, student-student and student-lecturer interactions. Student-lecturer interaction mostly focuses on lecturer initiated interactions such as announcements on the Learning Management System and a bit less on student initiated interactions. Personal conversations initiated by students are seldom dealt with. The research for this lecture was therefore specifically and exclusively focussed on personal conversations between students and lecturers that were initiated by students. These conversations included e-mails, letters, faxes, SMS’s, Whatsapp messages, home phone and cellular calls, appointments, Skype conversations and conversations at workshops and school visits. The objective of the research was to firstly find out what students were conversing about, how they were doing it and how it manifested in practice. Several patterns emerged from this that might have significance for universities. The research however also went beyond this thematic analysis and it went into the realm of interpretation of conversations to try and determine the underlying stimuli, reasons and motivations student had for initiating the conversations, because that would reflect their innate needs. Effective personal communication in distance learning is of prime importance and is in fact one of the pillars of efficient student interaction which ODL institutions in HE strive for. Learners benefit from increased interaction. It would therefore be imprudent not to seek every possible opportunity to create avenues, means and the necessary time for lecturers to engage in such conversations with students.Curriculum and Instructional Studies
Date
2017-05-15Type
Inaugural LectureIdentifier
oai:uir.unisa.ac.za:10500/22481http://hdl.handle.net/10500/22481
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Influence of Three Types of Interaction: Student-Instructor, Student-Student, Student Content, and Selected Demographic Characteristics on the Cognitive Achievement of Online Graduate StudentsDiaz-Cortes, Dagoberto (LSU Digital Commons, 2017-01-01)The primary purpose of this study was to examine the influence of selected types of interaction: Student-Instructor interaction, Student-Student interaction, and Student-Content interaction; and selected demographic characteristics on achievement of graduate students enrolled in an online engineering course at a university in the southeastern region of the United States. The study sample included 181 graduate students enrolled in an introductory level 7-week online course that was offered at different times between the fall semester of 2014 and the spring semester of 2016. The variables instructor, instructor preparation, course content, and course structure were integrated into the study design. The sampling plan involved the selection of students who enrolled in the same course and that were taught by the same instructor who had completed a training program in online teaching. Moreover, a score for the cognitive skill level targeted by the course and the degree of course alignment between learning objectives, learning activities, and the final exam was calculated using the Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The demographic variables studied included gender, age, prior online learning experience, and undergraduate GPA. The selected interactions: Student-Instructor, Student-Student, and Student-Content interactions were measured in terms of frequencies and average time spent on selected type of interaction for each student throughout the 7-week course. Student achievement was operationalized as the final grades in the course. Three variables were significantly correlated with student achievement: Student-Student interaction frequency, Student-Content interaction mean time occurrence, and undergraduate GPA. Also, male achievement scores were higher than female scores, a statistically significant difference of t(179) = 2.486, p = .014, d = .07. Furthermore, a hierarchical regression analysis determined a statistically significant model that explains the variance in student achievement from the selected demographic and interaction variables R2 = .175, F(10, 170) = 30.740, p = .0005. The variables gender, undergraduate GPA, Student-Student interaction frequency, and Student-Content interaction frequency, were identified as significant contributors to the model. Based on the study findings the researcher recommends the integration of collaborative activities in the design of online learning given the significant contribution that Student-Student interactions made to student achievement.
-
Use of online asynchronous discussion boards to engage students, enhance critical thinking, and foster staff-student/student-student collaboration: A mixed method studyOsborne, Debora M.; Byrne, Jacqui H.; Massey, Debbie L.; Johnston, Amy N.B. (Churchill Livingstone, 2018-11-01)Background: The ongoing challenges of managing large student enrolments and increasing demand from students for online learning platforms and teaching strategies has helped drive tertiary implementation of asynchronous online discussion boards (AOD). However, supporting and assessing students in such a forum remains contentious. Methods: This explorative, mixed methods study examined and evaluated the usage and perceptions of a unique form of AOD used in a postgraduate nursing course. Student survey and semi-structured interviews with staff (n = 3) were used to explore the structures, processes and outcomes of inclusion of an AOD in this online course. Triangulation of themes emerging from the staff interviews, survey outcomes, and student free text responses enabled appraisal of AOD, focusing primarily on its contribution to course content and assessment. Results: Students’ survey responses (approx. 24% of the cohort; n = 34) were largely positive. Themes that arose from the qualitative data included i) AOD to build a sense of student community, ii) AOD to encourage interaction with and deliberation of course content, iii) stimuli and challenges around assessing the discussion board, and iv) easy to use IT interface made it a more positive experience. Student responses suggested that scaffolding, feedback and sufficient time allocation were required. Many factors impacted on student interaction with the AOD, including a lack of time due to paid work and other coursework and assessments. Discussion: Overall, staff and students reported the assessed AOD was a positive course component. It encouraged engagement with staff, other students and the subtleties of complex course content, critical appraisal and discussion of evidence, and application to clinical practice. Exemplars and explicit marking criteria setting out the need for informed contributions were considered crucial by all stakeholders.
-
Analysis of the inconsistencies in the relationship between student critical thinking, student performance on the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency, and student grade point averages among minority students in a racially changing neighborhood.Wright, Otis B. (Northern Illinois University., 2011-06-22)Sorry, the full text of this article is not available in Huskie Commons. Please click on the alternative location to access it.