Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSarot, M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-05T01:26:39Z
dc.date.available2019-11-05T01:26:39Z
dc.date.created2013-06-29 08:32
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifieroai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/276933
dc.identifierModern theology 7, 135-152 (1991)
dc.identifierhttp://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/th/2013-0626-200502/UUindex.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3567625
dc.description.abstractIn the present paper I want to make some comments on the tendencies I just noted in contemporary Christian theodicy. I will argue, especially, (1) that Wiesel's story cannot with integrity be interpreted as suggesting a suf¬fering of God, not to speak of a theologia crucis; (2) that Christian theodicists should be reticent in using stories from Auschwitz and other Nazi concentration camps to il¬lustrate the horrors of (innocent and severe) suffer¬ing; and (3) that, even though the claim that theodicy requires a suffering God is true, this does not provide an independent argument in favor of the suffering of God.
dc.format.mediumapplication/msword
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartof0266-7177
dc.rights(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 1991
dc.subjectGodgeleerdheid
dc.titleAuschwitz, Morality and the Suffering of God
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncodeOAIDATA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:5168467
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gtl/5168467
ge.lastmodificationdate2013-09-11 09:44
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid147257
ge.oai.repositoryid1101
ge.oai.setnameGodgeleerdheid
ge.oai.setnameDARE FULL TEXT
ge.oai.setspechdl_1874_38
ge.oai.setspechdl_1874_12233
ge.oai.streamid5
ge.setnameGlobeTheoLib
ge.setspecglobetheolib
ge.linkhttp://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/th/2013-0626-200502/UUindex.html


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record