Author(s)
Banerjee, Abhijit V.Keywords
BORROWERBUSINESS OWNERS
DURABLE
WORKING CAPITAL
INCREASING RETURNS
LACK OF ACCESS
INTERNATIONAL BANK
SOCIAL RELATIONS
EXPECTED RETURNS
RISK AVERSION
CREDIT LIMIT
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
PRIVATE RETURNS
LAND REFORMS
MARKET CONSTRAINTS
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
ALLOCATION
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES
PRODUCTION FUNCTION
TRADE CREDIT
FORM OF CREDIT
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX
SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
TRANSACTION
ENTREPRENEURS
FINANCIAL ASSET
FIXED COST
SMALL BUSINESS
ASSETS
REAL EXCHANGE RATES
LIVING STANDARDS
PROFITABILITY
SHAREHOLDERS
MARGINAL PRODUCT
INFORMAL INSURANCE
CAPITAL MARKETS
RATES OF RETURN
DEPOSIT
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
COMPLEMENTARY INPUTS
BOND
HOLDING
AGRICULTURE
SMALL ENTERPRISES
DEFAULT COSTS
RECESSIONS
COST OF CAPITAL
INCOME INEQUALITY
GREEN REVOLUTION
CAPITAL STOCK
MONEYLENDERS
NATURAL RESOURCES
MARGINAL PRODUCTS
SMALL BUSINESSES
CONSUMPTION SMOOTHING
REAL INTEREST RATES
MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES
HIGH INTEREST RATES
ECONOMICS STUDIES
LENDER
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
LAND OWNERSHIP
RISK SHARING
BID
PRIME LENDING RATE
BANKS
REAL INTEREST
RATE OF RETURNS
MERITOCRACY
BANKING SYSTEM
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
OPPORTUNITY COST
LONG TERM INVESTMENT
INVESTMENT NEEDS
PAWN SHOPS
NUTRITION
BORROWING
INFORMAL LENDERS
INTEREST RATES
DIMINISHING RETURNS TO SCALE
RATES OF RETURNS
INSURANCE MARKETS
EMPOWERMENT
LENDERS
GROUPS OF PEOPLE
EXPROPRIATION
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS
STATEMENT
FISCAL POLICIES
HUMAN CAPITAL
VILLAGE
CREDIT CONSTRAINT
PRODUCTIVE ASSETS
NET WORTH
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY
FINANCIAL ASSETS
INFORMATIONAL ASYMMETRIES
TAX COLLECTION
MACROECONOMICS
INEFFICIENCY
SAVINGS
INSURANCE MARKET
EXPENDITURES
SLR
ENTREPRENEUR
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
MARKET ECONOMIES
AMOUNT OF RISK
CREDIT MARKET
POLITICAL ECONOMY
NEW BUSINESS
COLLATERAL
INVENTORIES
MORAL HAZARD
TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY
DUAL ECONOMY
ACCESS TO CREDIT
LAND RIGHTS
LOAN SIZE
INVESTMENT DECISION
DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
LAND TITLING
FACTORS OF PRODUCTION
PAWN
FAMILIES
INFORMAL CREDIT
UNDERVALUATION
ECONOMIC GROWTH
INEQUALITY
INVESTING
SOCIAL NORMS
STOCK MARKET
MICROCREDIT
LABOR MARKET
MORTGAGE
REPAYMENT
LAND REFORM
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT BANK
LAND MARKET
CREDIT CONSTRAINTS
TRANSACTION COSTS
SELF EMPLOYMENT
CAPITAL MARKET
DEFAULT RATE
OUTPUT PER CAPITA
LIQUID WEALTH
AGENCY PROBLEM
RURAL CREDIT MARKET
EARNINGS
EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL MARKETS
GDP
MARKET RETURN
DEPOSITORS
LEGAL OBLIGATION
LOAN
GROWTH RATE
INCOME
ASSET MARKETS
CAPACITY UTILIZATION
VILLAGES
MICROENTERPRISES
INTEREST COSTS
ECONOMIC THEORY
FARMERS
RURAL CREDIT
SMALL FARM
RESIDUAL CLAIMANT
DEFAULT RATES
LANDHOLDERS
FIXED COSTS
VALUE ADDED
DIVERSIFICATION
LOCAL FINANCE
PUBLIC FINANCE
EXTERNALITIES
PRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT
INTEREST RATE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FARMER
CREDIT MARKETS
DIMINISHING RETURNS
HOUSEHOLDS
EXPLICIT CREDIT
INCENTIVE COSTS
MACROECONOMIC POLICY
TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
INFORMAL FINANCE
PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY
INVESTMENT RETURNS
LEGAL TITLE
REAL ESTATE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GROWTH THEORY
HOUSEHOLD WEALTH
STOCKS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27940Abstract
The point of departure of this paper is
 that in the absence of effectively functioning asset markets
 the distribution of wealth matters for efficiency.
 Inefficient asset markets depress total factor productivity
 (TFP) in two ways: first, by not allowing efficient firms to
 grow to the size that they should achieve (this could
 include many great firms that are never started); and
 second, by allowing inefficient firms to survive by
 depressing the demand for factors (good firms are too small)
 and hence factor prices. Both of these effects are dampened
 when the wealth of the economy is in the hands of the most
 productive people, again, for two reasons: first, because
 they do not rely as much on asset markets to get outside
 resources into the firm; and second, because wealth allows
 them to self insure and therefore they are more willing to
 take the right amount of risk. None of this, however, tells
 us that efficiency enhancing redistributions must always be
 targeted to the poorest. There is some reason to believe
 that a lot of the inefficiency lies in the fact that many
 medium size firms are too small.Date
2009Type
Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/27940http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27940
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Estimating the Economic Opportunity Cost of Capital for Public Investment Projects : An Empirical Analysis of the Mexican CaseCoppola, Andrea; Fernholz, Fernando; Glenday, Graham (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-04-10)This paper offers an assessment of the
 methodologies employed to estimate the economic opportunity
 cost of capital for public sector projects, relying on the
 Mexican case for an applied empirical exercise. The
 traditional weighted cost of capital (top-down) approach
 used in the estimation of Mexico's economic opportunity
 cost of capital is reviewed and compared to the supply price
 (bottom-up) approach. With respect to previous studies using
 the top-down approach, this paper explores the contribution
 of domestic savings and expands the analysis to include a
 more detailed examination of the available macroeconomic,
 labor, financial, and tax information. The re-estimated
 top-down economic opportunity cost of capital for Mexico
 comes to 10.4 percent. To confirm these results and provide
 additional insights regarding the alternative bottom-up
 approach, the economic opportunity cost of capital is
 estimated using the supply price plus externalities method.
 For the case of Mexico, this paper recommends using a
 combination of estimation models (both the top-down and
 bottom-up approaches) to check the consistency of results
 and re-estimating the economic opportunity cost of capital
 every five years to accommodate for macroeconomic and fiscal
 changes. More broadly, the paper acknowledges the
 complexities involved in the estimation of the economic
 opportunity cost of capital for public investment projects
 and underlines the relevance of additional considerations,
 such as changes in global economic trends and country risk
 ratings, tax distortions, financial sector improvements, the
 impact of reforms, and data availability.
-
Getting Finance in South Asia 2009Kulathunga, Anoma; Sophastienphong, Kiatchai (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2008)This report, getting finance in South
 Asia 2009, published annually by the unit, reaffirms the
 World Bank's commitment to working with developing
 member countries to promote financial sector development and
 create financial systems that are sound, stable, supportive
 of growth, and responsive to people's needs. This
 program has enabled the Bank to initiate a dialogue with the
 supervisory authorities in South Asia to improve their data
 collection efforts, which will in turn strengthen their
 off-site supervision work. It also provides the impetus for
 the Bank to expand its monitoring and evaluation work. The
 getting finance indicators, and the country rankings that
 are based on them, are expected to become an increasingly
 important reference tool for the Bank in monitoring and
 evaluating development objectives and outcomes in its
 financial sector operations. These indicators should also
 prove to be a valuable tool for financial sector supervisory
 agencies in South Asia. The updated indicators, country
 rankings, and benchmarks should better equip these agencies
 to monitor the health of their respective country's
 banking system and to assess its robustness and
 sustainability relative to others in South Asia and in more
 developed economies.
-
Banking in Brazil : Structure, Performance, Drivers, and Policy ImplicationsUrdapilleta, Eduardo; Stephanou, Constantinos (2012-03-19)The objective of this paper is to
 analyze the industry structure of banking services in Brazil
 in order to shed light on financial performance and its
 drivers at a disaggregated level. The study illustrates how
 differences across market segments - which tend to be
 averaged out in aggregate analysis - need to be taken into
 account when analyzing performance and designing public
 policy for the banking sector. In particular, retail banking
 is found to be less sensitive to price competition and to
 exhibit considerably higher returns than corporate banking.
 The authors identify and discuss the factors underlying
 revenues, costs, and risks in each market segment, and
 conclude with policy implications.