Author(s)
Devisch, IgnaasGE21801001238122Keywords
Medicine and Health SciencesJUSTICE
WORK
EMPOWERMENT
PERSPECTIVE
SYSTEM
PROMOTION
LIFE-STYLE
PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY
INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY
Co-responsibility
Genealogy
Responsibility
Autonomy
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1258293/file/6753288https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1258293/file/6753289
Abstract
In this article, we focus at a key concept of today's healthcare, namely responsibility. Personal responsibility is so important today because it is obvious that the way society is organized, many people are facing a lot of difficulties to live their lives in a responsible way. We explicitly obtain an analysis of responsibility from a view which avoids the binary thinking which is so remarkably present in today's health care discourse. The aim of this pilot study is therefore to open up the horizon of the use of responsibility in today's healthcare. We develop the notion of 'co-responsibility' to understand how individuals, despite the fact they are responsible for their own agency, are always also affected by an ought which contaminates their efforts to fulfill their duties and obligations. We discuss co-responsibility not as conclusion or a magic formula to all problems, but as a new starting point of which we have to explore the opportunities for current and future health care dilemmas.In this article, we focus at a key concept of today's healthcare, namely responsibility. Personal responsibility is so important today because it is obvious that the way society is organized, many people are facing a lot of difficulties to live their lives in a responsible way. We explicitly obtain an analysis of responsibility from a view which avoids the binary thinking which is so remarkably present in today's health care discourse. The aim of this pilot study is therefore to open up the horizon of the use of responsibility in today's healthcare. We develop the notion of 'co-responsibility' to understand how individuals, despite the fact they are responsible for their own agency, are always also affected by an ought which contaminates their efforts to fulfill their duties and obligations. We discuss co-responsibility not as conclusion or a magic formula to all problems, but as a new starting point of which we have to explore the opportunities for current and future health care dilemmas.
A1
Date
2012Type
textIdentifier
oai:search.ugent.be:pug01:1258293https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1258293/file/6753288
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1258293/file/6753289
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Quantitative measures of corporate responsibilityΚουϊκογλου Βασιλης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Kouikoglou Vasilis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Φιλλης Ιωαννης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis); Yannis Phillis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis) (Published )Summarization: Corporate responsibility has many facets. It can be viewed as an interaction with the society to the mutual benefit of both partners. A corporation produces goods or services that the society demands. Production should be conducted so that its environmental impact is minimal, the economic state of the corporation is viable, labor conditions are good, and compliance with laws and regulations is satisfactory, among others. A model is presented that uses hierarchical fuzzy reasoning that assesses a facet of corporate responsibility, called sustainability, given a number of inputs, called basic indicators. Inputs are normalized on a scale (0, 1) according to their sustainability status and then combined to obtain a sustainability index on (0, 1) for each facet of the corporation. A sensitivity analysis pinpoints the most important indicators affecting sustainability. Two case studies of multinational companies, one of which is headquartered in Greece, are presented in detail. Both are producers of cement and other related building materials.
-
Διερεύνηση εταιρικής κοινωνικής ευθύνης και εταιρικής φήμης στην ΕλλάδαΖοπουνιδης Κωνσταντινος; Zopounidis Konstantinos; Δουμπος Μιχαλης; Doubos Michalis; Ατσαλακης Γεωργιος; Atsalakis Georgios; Επιβλέπων: Ζοπουνιδης Κωνσταντινος; Advisor: Zopounidis Konstantinos; Μέλος επιτροπής: Δουμπος Μιχαλης; Committee member: Doubos Michalis; et al. (Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης::Σχολή Μηχανικών Παραγωγής και ΔιοίκησηςTechnical University of Crete::School of Production Engineering and Management, Published )Μη διαθέσιμη περίληψη
-
Application of a fuzzy hierarchical model to the assessment of corporate social and environmental sustainabilityΚουϊκογλου Βασιλης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Kouikoglou Vasilis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Φιλλης Ιωαννης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis); Yannis Phillis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis) (John Wiley and Sons, Published )Summarization: Corporate responsibility has many facets. A corporation should organize its operations so that its environmental impact is minimal, its economic state is viable, labor conditions are good, and compliance with laws and regulations is satisfactory, among others. Corporate responsibility is intimately connected to corporate sustainability which expresses the economic, environmental, and social standing of a company. A responsible corporation embraces the principle of transparency of data pertaining to its performance and its policies and strives for strategies that enhance its sustainability. A model is presented that uses hierarchical fuzzy reasoning to assess corporate sustainability, given a number of inputs, called basic indicators. Inputs are normalized according to their sustainability status and then combined to obtain a sustainability index on [0, 1] for each facet of the corporation. A sensitivity analysis pinpoints the most important indicators affecting sustainability. Two case studies of multinational cement companies are presented in detail. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.