Author(s)Higgins, III, Ralph G
Contributor(s)ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA
KeywordsSociology and Law
Military Forces and Organizations
*MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)
MILITARY MORAL SUPERIORITY
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractThe all-volunteer force of the United States military has produced a military society and culture that is becoming increasingly detached from the greater United States' society that it is sworn to protect. This military-civilian gap is a threat to the United States in that it is potentially producing a military society that deems itself morally superior to civilian society, with military leaders that are cut from the same ideological molds, which invites a group-think mentality. Conversely, the military-civilian gap also is producing a civilian population governed by civilian leaders that have an inadequate understanding of military force, its limitations, and its true costs in lives and treasure in providing for the security of the nation. Taken to its extreme, the military-civilian gap can result in a military that is contemptuous of the greater American society, and an American public that is so disconnected from the military class that it fails to value or question the employment of American military forces. This paper will discuss the military-civilian gap, its causes, issues, and dangers to the United States, and will offer solutions to address this problem.
Strategy Research Project.
Copyright/LicenseApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Interagency Challenges and Solutions to NationbuildingNAVAL WAR COLL NEWPORT RI JOINT MILITARY OPERATIONS DEPT; Lewis, Chipper M. (2006-05-16)The United States has conducted nation-building operations every two years since the end of the Cold War. Despite these experiences and the lessons it has learned, interagency integration and execution below the theater strategic level continues to yield mixed results. The challenges in this area have reached their height during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Although significant effort has been made to improve these shortcomings, the long-term solution requires a dramatic institutional change that requires interagency individuals and units to be formed, trained, and deployed in a manner similar to their military counterparts.
Evaluating the U.S. Military's Development of Strategic and Operational Doctrine for Non-Lethal Weapons in a Complex Security EnvironmentARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS; Ogawa, James S. (2003-06-06)The end of the Cold War gave rise to a complex security environment resulting in a fundamental shift of focus from unrestricted warfare against a well-defined enemy towards a wide variety of military operations other than war (MOOTW) characterized by urbanized terrain, joint expeditions, non-state actors, and asymmetric threats. However, it is in exactly this kind of complex environment that non-lethal weapons (NLWs) can make major contributions by enabling more effective political-military strategies, and potentially changing the nature of war itself. To date, no joint doctrinal guidance on NLWs has been published. As a result of a lack of NLWs doctrine, there is an increased risk that NLWs supporting activities develop inefficiently, haphazardly, and possibly ineffectively. Thus, the central question is whether service publications or doctrine, training, leader development, organization, materiel, and soldier support (DTLOMS) exist which provide the U.S. Government's or services' policies and goals of its application of NLWs in a complex security environment. Four major areas are analyzed: military doctrine's role in shaping future technologies, the purpose of joint doctrine, the dynamics of MOOTW and peace support operations (PSOs), and finally, services as well as joint implementation and exploration of NLWs doctrine. An extensive bibliography of books, journal articles, government documents, unpublished materials, and other sources is included.
Civilian Protection in the Eastern DRC: Evaluation of the MONUSCO Peacekeeping OperationNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA DEPT OF NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS; Copeland, Thomas F (2012-03)Since 2003, language mandating civilian protection (POC) has increasingly appeared in United Nations Security Council resolutions, peace support doctrine, and humanitarian frameworks. Despite the frequency of its use, the term lacks a universal definition and a clear gap exists between military operations that attempt to establish, introduce, and/or enforce civilian protection and humanitarian approaches to civilian protection. This thesis posits three metrics that should be used to evaluate the effectiveness of peacekeeping operations that aim to establish POC: rates of civilian massacres, rates of internally displaced persons, and incidents of rape and sexual violence. These criteria share both military and humanitarian priorities, and they also represent elements of conflict present in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) since at least 1998. Each must be reduced to establish a minimum standard for civilian protection in the country. The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Congo (MONUSCO) was charged with implementing POC in the eastern regions of the DRC beginning in 2008. This thesis considers the ability of MONUSCO to address each of these POC metrics, and shows that the mission has fallen short of achieving its mandate to instill minimum standards of civilian protection. An evaluation of the three metrics requires a brief overview of the significant armed groups in the eastern DRC to better understand their involvement in the factors of instability that undermine POC. The significant combatant groups are the state's official military, the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC); the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR); National Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP); and the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). Other agents of conflict certainly perpetuate insecurity in the eastern DRC, but these are the most identifiable and disruptive actors.