Promover la regulación del comportamiento en tareas de aprendizaje cooperativo en línea a través de la evaluación
Keywords
aprendizaje cooperativoevaluación del aprendizaje
aprendizaje regulado
estrategias de enseñanza
aprendizaje
entornos virtuales de aprendizaje
educación superior
collaborative learning
learning assessment
teaching
learning strategies
regulated learning
online learning environments
higher education
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3693123Abstract
Although online collaborative learning presents new opportunities to promote regulated behaviors to support joint construction of meaning, in teaching practice it can present several difficulties. The purpose of this article is to explain, from a sociocultural perspective, some of the strategies employed by students when engaged in cooperative learning tasks. A virtual university course was studied empirically to evaluate and promote cooperative regulated behavior during argumentative tasks based on written argumentation in virtual and asynchronous communication environments.El aprendizaje cooperativo en línea presenta nuevas oportunidades para promover comportamientos regulados que favorezcan la construcción conjunta de conocimientos. Sin embargo, en la práctica docente este aspecto es una preocupación y presenta diversas dificultades. El propósito de este artículo es explicar, desde la perspectiva sociocultural, algunos comportamientos más estratégicos de los estudiantes durante el desarrollo de tareas de aprendizaje cooperativo. Se describe un estudio empírico realizado en un curso en una universidad virtual sobre cuya base se presenta una propuesta metodológica para evaluar y promover comportamientos regulados durante tareas cooperativas con demandas argumentativas en entornos virtuales asincrónicos y escritos.
Date
2011Type
text (article)Identifier
oai:dialnet.unirioja.es:ART0000422238http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3693123
(Revista) ISSN 1138-2783
Copyright/License
LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAICollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
LEARNING STRATEGIES AND E-LEARNING. SOME NOTES ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF LEARNING DESIGN IN VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. CONSIDERATIONS FOR REFLEXION AND DEBATE. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF LEARNING STRATEGIES AND STYLESEsteban, Manuel; Zapata Ros, Miguel (Revista de Educación a Distancia, 2008-01-31)This article deals with concepts and topics of present relevance: learning styles and strategies, metacognition, and their role in the foundation of the learning design of e-learning activities and virtual learning environments. (VLE). The importance of metacognition in e-learning stands out, basically taking into account the selection, sequencing and organization of contents which pay particular attention to students’ specific characteristics and learning situations. The qualities of promoting self-study and autonomy that these environments have seem to need, more than others, a sound knowledge of the student’s own learning resources. However, is it easy or feasible to include elements to increase these resources , which pertain unavoidably and in a non-tranferable way to the student’s self? How, or which are the cognitive or regulating tools of one’s own knowledge that are to be used? Under which criteria or conditions could elements to control the cognitive activity of the individuals be incorporated in e-learning activities? Could this role be fulfilled by didactic guides or by specifications in learning design? Under which criteria and conditions? – these are the questions we pose. As regards learning syles, we wonder if the information available is enough to define the features of an apropriate learning style for VLE, or rather, if it’s necesary to take them into account for the instructional design. So, do we observe and learn enough about the students’ learning styles so as to direct teaching towards better learning conditions in the VLE, or make them posible, at least? Which may be the essential elements in the VLE and in the instructional design to carry out this function?
-
Knowledge construction and regulation of learning in asynchronous collaborative tasksPrograma de Mejoramiento del Profesorado (PROMEP). Dirección General Educación Superior Universitaria -; Niño Carrasco, Shamaly Alhelí; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC); Castellanos Ramírez, Juan Carlos; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC); Hernandez, Esperanza Viloria; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC) (AperturaAperturaApertura, 2019-03-29)This article presents the results of a research developed with students of bachelor's degree in education from Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexico. In six small groups of students, collaborative learning processes in asynchronous communication technology environments were analyzed. Through a multiple case study methodology, the discourse displayed by the students during their collaboration was analyzed with a double focus: the cognitive discourse oriented to the knowledge construction and the discourse aimed to regulate the task. The results highlights that the establishment of goals, the formulation of positive expectations about the task, the monitoring of progress and the socio-emotional support are regulatory mechanisms that contribute strongly to the development of rich and profound processes of shared knowledge construction. A positive effect of the regulatory discourse on the cognitive activity of students is concluded.
-
Learning Strategies and E-Learning. Some Notes on the Foundations of Learning Design in Virtual Learning EnvironmentsEsteban-Albert, Manuel; Universidad de Murcia. Murcia; Zapata-Ros, Miguel; Universidad de Murcia. Murcia (Revista de Educación a Distancia, 2016-10-21)This article deals with concepts and topics of present relevance: learning styles and strategies, metacognition, and their role in the foundation of the learning design of e-learning activities and virtual learning environments. (VLE).The importance of metacognition in e-learning stands out, basically taking into account the selection, sequencing and organization of contents which pay particular attention to students’ specific characteristics and learning situations. The qualities of promoting self-study and autonomy that these environments have seem to need, more than others, a sound knowledge of the student’s own learning resources. However, is it easy or feasible to include elements to increase these resources, which pertain unavoidably and in a non-tranferable way to the student’s self? How, or which are the cognitive or regulating tools of one’s own knowledge that are to be used? Under which criteria or conditions could elements to control the cognitive activity of the individuals be incorporated in e-learning activities? Could this role be fulfilled by didactic guides or by specifications in learning design? Under which criteria and conditions? – these are the questions we pose.As regards learning syles, we wonder if the information available is enough to define the features of an apropriate learning style for VLE, or rather, if it’s necesary to take them into account for the instructional design. So, do we observe and learn enough about the students’ learning styles so as to direct teaching towards better learning conditions in the VLE, or make them posible, at least? Which may be the