Meeting type of planning of work and evaluation in the institutions for higher education

Abstract

The topic of Meeting Type of Planning of Work and Evaluation in the Institutions for Higher Education is socially very justified. The preparation of best ways of carrying out of all the activities in an institution for higher education and evaluation of the degree of achievement of the set goal and tasks, i.e. synchronizing of work on human resources with the social developments, are the best indicators of the social justification for this topic. In this book we would like to point out the need for increased activity of the major stakeholders in the process of higher education - the students and teachers, and need of their more intensive engagement in planned, systematic, and organized working on assimilating educational contents, i.e. in working on preparing social youth with competences. In this paper we deal with question of competences, which are acquired during postgraduate education, i.e. we impose a dilemma: Who do our institutions for higher education prepare the human resources for? In other words, we deal with questions of interdependence between a profession and a curriculum. Furthermore, in this paper the question, which inevitably arises, is about the difference between curriculum approach and traditional approaches in planning and programming, as well as about curriculum modeling in higher education. It is recommended that institutions for higher education develop strategy for introducing curriculum, which asks for an appropriate expert support provided to university professors. After all, once more we consider matriculation of students, professors, scientific research projects and curriculum. At first sight, it seems that this topic has already been broadly elaborated. However, if the functioning of the institutions for higher education is looked at in its essence, formality and copying of traditional approach is what is found. There is a considerable insufficiency of publications coming from our competent experts who follow and create ways of implementation of Bologna process.