Keywords
Bone MarrowCase Studies
Children
Competence
Consent
Directed Donation
Donors
Evaluation
Family Relationship
Informed Consent
Kidneys
Living Donors
Moral Obligations
Nature
Organ Donation
Parent Child Relationship
Parental Consent
Parents
Risk
Risks and Benefits
Siblings
Social Interaction
Standards
Substituted Judgment
Tissue Donation
Transplant Recipients
Transplantation
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Rethinking+Transplantation+between+Siblings&title=Hastings+Center+Report.++&volume=25&issue=5&pages=7-12&date=1995&au=Dwyer,+Jameshttps://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3562788
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/748466
Abstract
In case of transplantation between siblings, we believe that the standard approach misconstrues the nature of the ethical problem, ignores the ethical import of family relationships, and requires an egocentric evaluation of the situation. We shall try to offer an alternative way of thinking about these cases, a way that takes seriously the ethical aspect of relationships. But before we formulate an alternative, we want to examine the standard approach. The standard approach to questions about placing persons at risk is based on a ranking of the following ideas: (1) informed consent, (2) substituted judgment, and (3) best interests.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/74846610.2307/3562788
Hastings Center Report. 1995 Sep-Oct; 25(5): 7-12.
0093-0334
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Rethinking+Transplantation+between+Siblings&title=Hastings+Center+Report.++&volume=25&issue=5&pages=7-12&date=1995&au=Dwyer,+James
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3562788
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/748466