Author(s)
<vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Michael Prosser\nTITLE:\nORG:\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;Institute for Teaching and Learning;University of Sydney;Sydney NSW 2006;Australia;;US\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+(02) 9351 4572\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+(02) 9351 4331\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:M.Prosser@itl.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard><vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Paul Walker\nTITLE:\nORG:\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;Physics Education Research Group;University of Sydney;Sydney NSW 2006;Australia;;US\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>
<vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Rosemary Millar\nTITLE:\nORG:\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;Physics Education Research Group;University of Sydney;Sydney NSW 2006;Australia;;US\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+(02) 935 15975 \nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:millar@physics.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>
Keywords
educationphysics
teaching
students'-perceptions
learning
physics
higher-education
understanding
subject-matter
first-year-physics-students
University-of-Sydney
open-ended-response-survey
General Physics
Physics Education Research
Education Foundations
Assessment
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022Abstract
Recent research on student learning in higher education has highlighted the effect that students' perceptions of the nature of learning and understanding of their discipline has on their consequent understanding of the subject matter. This present project grew out of a programme aimed to help first-year students in physics develop their ideas on the nature of physics and how to study it. One of the issues to emerge from that project was the need to develop a more detailed understanding of students' perceptions, to be used both in further planning of the program and in its evaluation. This paper reports on the results of that study. It involved a before (340 students) and after (110) survey of first-year physics students at the University of Sydney. They were asked to complete an open-ended response survey, including questions on how they go about studying physics and what they thought the study of physics was about. A phenomenographic methodology was used to identify categories of description for each of the questions. The paper will describe the categories in some detail and the distribution of responses across the categories. It will also discuss a number of issues to emerge from the study and some implications for the practice of teaching physics.Type
Reference MaterialIdentifier
oai:compadre.org:2609http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022
compadre.org:2609
Copyright/License
Has a copyright or other licensing restriction.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Development and Use of a Conceptual Survey in Introductory Quantum Physics<vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Sura Wuttiprom\nORG:Mahidol University\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;;;;;;TH\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Manjula Devi Sharma\nTITLE:\nORG:Sydney University Physics Education Research group\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics A28;University of Sydney;Sydney;Other;NSW 2006;AU\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+(02) 935 12051\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:sharma@physics.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Ian D. Johnston\nTITLE:\nORG:Sydney University Physics Education Research Group\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics A28;University of Sydney;New South Wales;Other;2006;US\nTEL;TYPE=Business:+(02) 935 15982\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Personal:i.johnston@physics.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Ratchapak Chitaree\nORG:Mahidol University\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;;;;;;TH\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Chernchok Soankwan\nTITLE:\nORG:Mahidol University\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;;;;Other;;TH\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+0 2201 5776\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:sccsk@mahidol.ac.th\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>Conceptual surveys have become increasingly popular at many levels to probe various aspects of science education research such as measuring student understanding of basic concepts and assessing the effectiveness of pedagogical material. The aim of this study was to construct a valid and reliable multiple-choice conceptual survey to investigate students’ understanding of introductory quantum physics concepts. We examined course syllabi to establish content coverage, consulted with experts to extract fundamental content areas, and trialled open-ended questions to determine how the selected content areas align with students’ difficulties. The questions were generated and trialled with different groups of students. Each version of the survey was critiqued by a group of discipline and teaching experts to establish its validity. The survey was administered to 312 students at the University of Sydney. Using the data from this sample, we performed five statistical tests (item difficulty index, item discrimination index, item point biserial coefficient, KR-21 reliability test, and Ferguson’s delta) to evaluate the test’s reliability and discriminatory power. The result indicates that our survey is a reliable test. This study also provided data from which preliminary findings were drawn on students’ understandings of introductory quantum physics concepts. The main point is that questions which require an understanding of the standard interpretations of quantum physics are more challenging for students than those grouped as non-interpretative. The division of conceptual questions into interpretive and non-interpretive needs further exploration.
-
Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten year study<vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Manjula Devi Sharma\nTITLE:\nORG:Sydney University Physics Education Research group\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics A28;University of Sydney;Sydney;Other;NSW 2006;AU\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+(02) 935 12051\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:sharma@physics.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Ian D. Johnston\nTITLE:\nORG:\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;;;;Other;;\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Helen Johnston\nORG:University of Sydney\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics;;New South Wales;;2006;AU\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Kevin Varvell\nORG:University of Sydney\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics;;New South Wales;;2006;AU\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Gordon Robertson\nORG:University of Sydney\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics;;New South Wales;;2006;AU\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Andrew Hopkins\nORG:University of Sydney\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics;;New South Wales;;2006;AU\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Chris Stewart\nORG:Sydney University Physics Education Research Group, University of Sydney\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;Sydney University Physics Education Research Group, University of Sydney;NSW, 2006, Australia;;;;AU\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Ian Cooper\nORG:University of Sydney\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics;;New South Wales;;2006;AU\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Ronald K. Thornton\nTITLE:\nORG:Center for Science and Mathematics Teaching\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;Tufts University;Department of Physics and Astronomy;Medford;MA;02155;US\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:ronald.thornton@tufts.edu\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>In this study, the effect of using interactive lecture demonstrations (ILDs) was investigated over a ten year span. In Project 1, the ILDs were implemented from 1999 to 2001 with students who had successfully completed senior high school physics. In Project 2, the ILDs were implemented from 2007 to 2009 with students who had not studied senior high school physics. The paper also reports on teacher experiences of using the ILDs, in Project 2.
-
Workshop Tutorials for Physics: Properties of Matter - Regular<vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nORG:UniServe Science\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;Carslaw Building (F07);The University of Sydney, NSW 2006;;Other;;AU\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+(02) 9531 2960\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:direct_uniserve@mail.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>; <vcard>BEGIN:vCard\nVERSION:3.0\nFN:Manjula Devi Sharma\nTITLE:\nORG:Sydney University Physics Education Research group\nADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;School of Physics A28;University of Sydney;Sydney;Other;NSW 2006;AU\nTEL;TYPE=Office:+(02) 935 12051\nTEL;TYPE=:+\nTEL;TYPE=FAX:+\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,Work:sharma@physics.usyd.edu.au\nEMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET,:\nEND:vCard</vcard>This resource is a set of activity-based physics tutorials and worksheets on properties of matter, developed for students who have successfully completed a course in high school physics. It was designed to be implemented in student-centered cooperative learning environments. The tutorials feature thematic workshops across a broad range of topics relating to pressure, buoyancy, density, fluid flow, stress, strain, elasticity, bonding, and crystal structures. Workshop Tutorials were deliberately designed to not be part of the formal assessment procedure, allowing students to openly discuss problems in physics and explore solutions in a stress-free environment. Solutions are provided to students as they leave the class, giving them immediate feedback on their ideas. All materials, including worksheets and solutions, are available in Word and PDF formats. Created by the University of Sydney Physics Education Research group (SUPER) this item is part of a larger collection of activity-based physics tutorials.