Suaugusiųjų , siekiančių įgyti vidurinį išsilavinimą, švietimo prieinamumo vertinimas
Keywords
Neformalusis ugdymasNon-formal education
Mokslo laisvė
Academic freedom
Vidurinis mokslas
Education, secondary
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://vddb.library.lt/fedora/get/LT-eLABa-0001:J.04~2013~ISSN_1648-9098.N_3_31.PG_107-120/DS.002.0.01.ARTICAbstract
Straipsnyje apibūdinama švietimo prieinamumo samprata ir atskleidžiama subjektyviosios švietimo prieinamumo pusės raiška, remiantis suaugusiųjų švietimo organizatorių ir vartotojų nuomonės tyrimo rezultatais pateikiamas suaugusiųjų, siekiančių įgyti vidurinį išsilavinimą, švietimo prieinamumo vertinimas psichologiniu edukologiniu ir socialiniu edukologiniu aspektais. Analizuojami suaugusiųjų mokymosi motyvai, prioritetai, poreikiai, lūkesčiai ir ugdymo aplinkos pritaikymo reikšmė. Apibendrinama, kad suaugusiųjų švietimo prieinamumas yra reikšmingas siekiant ugdymosi sėkmės, o tyrimas padeda geriau suprasti suaugusiųjų mokymosi procesą, jį valdyti ir tobulinti.The European Union considers lifelong learning one of the means that helps achieve social cohesion and competitiveness in modern society and the world economy. The European Union has tried to achieve the goal of12,5 % of people aged 25-64 to pursue a secondary education; however, this indicator has not been reached. Comparing with other European countries, the level of lifelong learning among Lithuanians at the age of 20-64 is low, although starting from the year 2003 it was growing and in 2011 it reached 5,9 %. The aim of adults to a get secondary education is stimulated not only by growing requirements of labour market but also by social and psychological factors. A successful return on the education system and a completed secondary education can open doors to further aims – to formal and informal education and the development of a person’s self-confidence. The indicators of the acquisition of secondary education show that the number of youth at the age of 18-24 who received a secondary education is increasing in Lithuania; however, the indicator for further learning after receiving a secondary education is decreasing. Besides, not only are the differences of adult education organisation in different municipalities noticed, but also the differences among a part of the youth at the age of 18-24, that do not have a secondary education and are not studying in the cities and villages, as well as the distribution of the mentioned youth among men and women. An important factor of... [to full text]
Date
2013Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:elaba.lt:LT-eLABa-0001:J.04~2013~ISSN_1648-9098.N_3_31.PG_107-120LT-eLABa-0001:J.04~2013~ISSN_1648-9098.N_3_31.PG_107-120
http://vddb.library.lt/fedora/get/LT-eLABa-0001:J.04~2013~ISSN_1648-9098.N_3_31.PG_107-120/DS.002.0.01.ARTIC