Evaluating critical thinking skills development: One community - two approaches
dc.contributor.author | McGuirl-Hadley, Joy A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-25T17:36:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-25T17:36:59Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-09-04 23:35 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | oai:scholarsarchive.jwu.edu:dissertations-1090 | |
dc.identifier | http://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/dissertations/AAI3234454 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/382607 | |
dc.description.abstract | The acquisition and application of knowledge is a prerequisite for many jobs, yet increasing numbers of employees are entering the business world without higher-order thinking skills (Achieve, 2005; Paul, 1995; Robbins & DeCenzo, 2005). This study examined the effectiveness of the existing curriculum at building critical thinking skills in two types of settings: community college and manufacturing businesses in Southeastern Massachusetts. Using the Test of Everyday Reasoning (Facione, 2000), pre- and post-tests were conducted with community college students (n = 67), business employees (n = 36), and a control group (n = 23). Utilizing semi-structured interviews, data were gathered from a randomly selected sub-sample (n = 22) and from the course instructors (N = 6) to determine use made of acquired critical thinking skills.^ Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to equate the three groups and no significant differences was found among the pre-test scores by group, F(2, 94) = 1.35, p = .27. Using the Pearson correlation coefficient, a strong relationship was found for the pre- and post-test scores, r = .83, r2 = .64, p < .01. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the pre-test as covariate and the Scheffé test to adjust for difference in group sizes, showed no significant difference among the adjusted post-test scores F(2, 93) = .38, p = .69. In comparison with normative data, the average for the sample of college students and business employees was at the 36th percentile.^ The qualitative data suggested two findings: that all instructors defined and embedded critical thinking skills in their syllabi, though this was not done intentionally by the community college instructors; and that subjects concretely demonstrated critical thinking skills and attributed these skills to what they learned during courses.^ Based on the study findings, two recommendations were made: (1) bring critical thinking skills into the classroom, identify it, teach it directly, and share it with students to increase their critical thinking skills and metacognition; and (2) promote collaborative partnerships between education and business to foster coherent and effective education and workforce development systems.^ | |
dc.language | EN | |
dc.publisher | ScholarsArchive@JWU | |
dc.source | Dissertation & Theses Collection | |
dc.subject | Education, Community College|Education, Adult and Continuing|Education, Business | |
dc.title | Evaluating critical thinking skills development: One community - two approaches | |
dc.type | text | |
ge.collectioncode | EC | |
ge.dataimportlabel | OAI metadata object | |
ge.identifier.legacy | globethics:14967768 | |
ge.identifier.permalink | https://www.globethics.net/gel/14967768 | |
ge.lastmodificationdate | 2018-09-04 23:35 | |
ge.lastmodificationuser | admin@pointsoftware.ch (import) | |
ge.submissions | 0 | |
ge.oai.exportid | 149801 | |
ge.oai.repositoryid | 991 | |
ge.oai.streamid | 2 | |
ge.setname | GlobeEthicsLib | |
ge.setspec | globeethicslib | |
ge.link | http://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/dissertations/AAI3234454 |