Torts for Wrongful Birth/Life & Prenatal Abuse. Natalité et procréation : le rôle fondamental du judiciaire américain
Abstract
In 1994, French Parliamentary representatives voted a «bio-ethics» law largely based on the advice and consent of a national bioethics committee inaugurated by President Mitterrand. In the United States, the lack of similar centralized policymaking has created a situation wherein on the one hand market forces in the realm of biogenetics and medically-assisted procreation benefit from almost total freedom of activity, while on the other hand conflicts resulting from the social consequences of these new scientific fields are left almost solely in the hands of the judiciary. This article examines the often uncomfortable, and sometimes inappropriate role played by the judiciary branch, especially in the realm of new tort law concepts, and attempts to demonstrate how the latter might be contributing, albeit indirectly, to a future "fetal rights" juridical framework.Date
1996Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:persee:article/rfea_0397-7870_1996_num_68_1_1635http://www.persee.fr/doc/rfea_0397-7870_1996_num_68_1_1635
doi:10.3406/rfea.1996.1635
DOI
10.3406/rfea.1996.1635ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3406/rfea.1996.1635