Author(s)
Porter, JeanGE Subjects
Religious ethicsSpirituality and ethics
Methods of ethics
Theological ethics
Philosophical ethics
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://globethics.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0953946806071560Abstract
In this response, I address Professor Rhonheimer’s charge that I deny the rational character of the natural law in my recent book. On the contrary, my theory of natural law is developed through an extended analysis of the ways in which reason draws on and informs the intelligibilities inherent in nature, understood in diverse ways. In this response, I focus on two issues to which Professor Rhonheimer gives extended attention, the first interpretative, the second constructive—namely, first, Aquinas’s conception of reason, its scope and limits, and secondly, the prospects for moral universalism.Date
2006-12Type
ArticleIdentifier
SAGE-10.1177/0953946806071560ISSN-0953-9468
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0953946806071560
DOI
10.1177/0953946806071560Copyright/License
Sage Publicationsae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/0953946806071560