• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Ethics in Higher Education
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Ethics in Higher Education
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Feature inference with uncertain categorization:Re-assessing Anderson’s rational model

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Konovalova, Elizaveta
Le Mens, Gaël
Keywords
Bayesian model
Categories
Feature inferences
Judgments
Predictions
Rational analysis
Decision Making
Hormones/blood
Uncertainty
Humans

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3877049
Online Access
https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/108f06ac-a62b-4493-990a-4a5781a6bd09
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1372-y
Abstract
<
p
>
A key function of categories is to help predictions about unobserved features of objects. At the same time, humans are often in situations where the categories of the objects they perceive are uncertain. In an influential paper, Anderson (Psychological Review, 98(3), 409–429, 1991) proposed a rational model for feature inferences with uncertain categorization. A crucial feature of this model is the conditional independence assumption—it assumes that the within category feature correlation is zero. In prior research, this model has been found to provide a poor fit to participants’ inferences. This evidence is restricted to task environments inconsistent with the conditional independence assumption. Currently available evidence thus provides little information about how this model would fit participants’ inferences in a setting with conditional independence. In four experiments based on a novel paradigm and one experiment based on an existing paradigm, we assess the performance of Anderson’s model under conditional independence. We find that this model predicts participants’ inferences better than competing models. One model assumes that inferences are based on just the most likely category. The second model is insensitive to categories but sensitive to overall feature correlation. The performance of Anderson’s model is evidence that inferences were influenced not only by the more likely category but also by the other candidate category. Our findings suggest that a version of Anderson’s model which relaxes the conditional independence assumption will likely perform well in environments characterized by within-category feature correlation.
<
/p
>
Date
2018-10
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:sdu.dk:openaire_cris_publications/108f06ac-a62b-4493-990a-4a5781a6bd09
https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/108f06ac-a62b-4493-990a-4a5781a6bd09
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1372-y
Copyright/License
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Collections
Ethics in Higher Education

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.