• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Education and Research Ethics
  • Research Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Education and Research Ethics
  • Research Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

The Value of Nurses’ Codes: European nurses’ views

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Tadd, Win
Clarke, Angela
Lloyd, Llynos
Leino-Kilpi, Helena
Strandell, Camilla
Lemonidou, Chryssoula
Petsios, Konstantinos
Sala, Roberta
Barazzetti, Gaia
Radaelli, Stefania
Keywords
European codes of ethics
nurses’ codes of ethics
qualitative research
GE Subjects
Economic ethics
Bioethics
Labour/professional ethics
Technology ethics
Medical ethics
Health ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3884323
Online Access
https://globethics.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/0969733006ne891oa
Abstract
Nurses are responsible for the well-being and quality of life of many people, and therefore must meet high standards of technical and ethical competence. The most common form of ethical guidance is a code of ethics/professional practice; however, little research on how codes are viewed or used in practice has been undertaken. This study, carried out in six European countries, explored nurses’ opinions of the content and function of codes and their use in nursing practice. A total of 49 focus groups involving 311 nurses were held. Purposive sampling ensured a mix of participants from a range of specialisms. Qualitative analysis enabled emerging themes to be identified on both national and comparative bases. Most participants had a poor understanding of their codes. They were unfamiliar with the content and believed they have little practical value because of extensive barriers to their effective use. In many countries nursing codes appear to be ‘paper tigers’ with little or no impact; changes are needed in the way they are developed and written, introduced in nurse education, and reinforced/implemented in clinical practice.
Date
2006-07
Type
Article
Identifier
SAGE-10.1191/0969733006ne891oa
ISSN-0969-7330
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/0969733006ne891oa
DOI
10.1191/0969733006ne891oa
Copyright/License
Sage Publications
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1191/0969733006ne891oa
Scopus Count
Collections
Research Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.