Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQing Yang
dc.contributor.authorYan Song
dc.contributor.authorYinying Cai
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-16T20:14:25Z
dc.date.available2020-09-16T20:14:25Z
dc.date.created2020-09-14 23:35
dc.date.issued2020-09-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:d5f2b89ce959404fa41fe39db5d90e5d
dc.identifier10.3390/su12187447
dc.identifier2071-1050
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/d5f2b89ce959404fa41fe39db5d90e5d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3964936
dc.description.abstractUrban village redevelopment has multidimensional impacts on resettled households. These impacts can reflect the sustainability of urban village redevelopment. This study empirically compares the gains and losses of the welfare in economic conditions, living conditions, natural environment, psychological conditions, and social security in bottom-up and top-down urban village redevelopment cases in Wuhan, China. The results show that a bottom-up redevelopment mode with participative residents caused negative effects in economic welfare but positive effects on living conditions, natural environment, and psychological condition, thus promoting higher comprehensive welfare and satisfaction. Top-down redevelopment led by the government provides villagers with shared dividends through collective economic reform and thus, contributes to gains in economic conditions and social security. However, top-down redevelopment with less participation of residents leads to welfare losses in living conditions, natural environment, and psychological conditions, which results in lower welfare and satisfaction levels overall. Therefore, a middle-out redevelopment mode with a combination of government efforts and public participation are proposed as a solution for sustainable urban redevelopment.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7447
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050
dc.sourceSustainability, Vol 12, Iss 7447, p 7447 (2020)
dc.subjecturban village renewal
dc.subjectredevelopment modes
dc.subjectwelfare changes
dc.subjectresettled households
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectEnvironmental effects of industries and plants
dc.subjectTD194-195
dc.subjectRenewable energy sources
dc.subjectTJ807-830
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences
dc.titleBlending Bottom-Up and Top-Down Urban Village Redevelopment Modes: Comparing Multidimensional Welfare Changes of Resettled Households in Wuhan, China
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncode2071-1050
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:16836164
ge.lastmodificationdate2020-09-14 23:35
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid150302
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Environmental effects of industries and plants
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Renewable energy sources
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Environmental sciences
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkVudmlyb25tZW50YWwgZWZmZWN0cyBvZiBpbmR1c3RyaWVzIGFuZCBwbGFudHM~
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlJlbmV3YWJsZSBlbmVyZ3kgc291cmNlcw~~
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkVudmlyb25tZW50YWwgc2NpZW5jZXM~
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/d5f2b89ce959404fa41fe39db5d90e5d


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record