Patients from across Europe have similar views on patient-centred care: an international multilingual qualitative study in infertility care.
Author(s)
Dancet, E A FD'Hooghe, T M
Sermeus, W
van Empel, I
Strohmer, H
Wyns, Christine
Santa-Cruz, D
Nardo, L G
Kovatchki, D
Vanlangenakker, L
Garcia-Velasco, J
Mulugeta, B
Nelen, W L D M
Kremer, J A M
Contributor(s)
UCL - SSS/IREC/GYNE - Pôle de GynécologieKeywords
AdultFertilization in Vitro
Focus Groups
Great Britain
Humans
Infertility
Insemination, Artificial
International Cooperation
Language
Male
Patient Education as Topic
Attitude of Health Personnel
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Patient-Centered Care
Spain
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
Attitude to Health
Austria
Belgium
Communication
Emotions
Europe
Female
Patient-centre care
Health-care quality
Infertility
Qualitative research
International
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/121389Abstract
The PCIC-model is the first patient-centred care (PCC) model based on the patients' perspective to be validated in an international setting. Although health-care organization and performance differ, the similarities between countries in the infertile patients' perspective were striking, as were the similarities with PCC models from other clinical conditions. A non-condition specific international PCC model and a European instrument for the patient centredness of infertility care could be developed. European professionals can learn from each other on how to provide PCC.Date
2012Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:121389boreal:121389
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/121389
info:doi/10.1093/humrep/des061
info:pmid/22427309
urn:ISSN:0268-1161
urn:EISSN:1460-2350
Copyright/License
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
“What Is PER?” Patient Engagement in Research as a HitBélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe; Del Grande, Claudio; Rouleau, Geneviève (Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalÉrudit, 2018)Engaging patients in research conduct and agenda setting is increasingly considered as an ethical imperative, and a way to transcend views of patients as passive subjects by fostering their empowerment. However, patient engagement in research (PER) is still an emerging approach with debated definitional and operational frameworks. This song addresses the sometimes difficult encounter and elusive mutual understanding between researchers and patients. “What is PER?” is an impressionistic illustration of the challenges and issues that can be found in the universe of patient engagement in research.
-
Do Patients Know How to Use Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate?HENMAN, MARTIN; Deasy, Evelyn; Kirke, Ciara; Naddy, Helen (2018-07-06)PUBLISHED
-
[Autonomy and practical identity. Cornerstones to ethical physician behavior].Colt, Henri (eScholarship, University of California, 2006-01-01)Three frequent problems of daily medical practice are analyzed: (1) a physician's perceived obligation to provide medical services regardless of whether one's health care institution provides monetary compensation for the medical act, (2) increasing pressures to obtain informed consent in a national context where paternalistic physician-patient interactions have been customary, and (3) a physician's professional responsibility to offer internationally recognized standard of care even if this means allocating expensive tertiary healthcare resources to a small number of patients in spite of one's knowledge that national governments are unable to provide primary care to millions of their citizens. These problems are discussed from the point of view of the ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy. Potential limiting factors (cultural, financial, religious or disease-related influences) on autonomy of patients and doctors are identified. The functions of patient autonomy in the framework of four different patient-doctor interaction models (paternalist, informative, interpretative and deliberatibe) are described. Physician leaders, health care institutions, and professional organizations are responsible for creating an environment in which doctors can discuss ethical issues as comfortably and as frequently as they discuss biological matters. Health care providers should do their best to recover the human side of medical practice which, undoubtedly, would create a greater likelihood that appropriate decisions will be made when facing complex ethical dilemmas.