The effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Keywords
adolescentadult
athletic injuries / prevention & control
child
cumulative trauma disorders / prevention & control
exercise therapy / methods
muscle strength / physiology
randomized controlled trials as topic
young adult
VDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330::Other subjects within physical education: 339
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/279729Abstract
I Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på bjsm.bmj.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092538 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at bjsm.bmj.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092538BACKGROUND: Physical activity is important in both prevention and treatment of many common diseases, but sports injuries can pose serious problems. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physical activity exercises can reduce sports injuries and perform stratified analyses of strength training, stretching, proprioception and combinations of these, and provide separate acute and overuse injury estimates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched and yielded 3462 results. Two independent authors selected relevant randomised, controlled trials and quality assessments were conducted by all authors of this paper using the Cochrane collaboration domain-based quality assessment tool. Twelve studies that neglected to account for clustering effects were adjusted. Quantitative analyses were performed in STATA V.12 and sensitivity analysed by intention-to-treat. Heterogeneity (I(2)) and publication bias (Harbord's small-study effects) were formally tested. RESULTS: 25 trials, including 26 610 participants with 3464 injuries, were analysed. The overall effect estimate on injury prevention was heterogeneous. Stratified exposure analyses proved no beneficial effect for stretching (RR 0.963 (0.846-1.095)), whereas studies with multiple exposures (RR 0.655 (0.520-0.826)), proprioception training (RR 0.550 (0.347-0.869)), and strength training (RR 0.315 (0.207-0.480)) showed a tendency towards increasing effect. Both acute injuries (RR 0.647 (0.502-0.836)) and overuse injuries (RR 0.527 (0.373-0.746)) could be reduced by physical activity programmes. Intention-to-treat sensitivity analyses consistently revealed even more robust effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a few outlying studies, consistently favourable estimates were obtained for all injury prevention measures except for stretching. Strength training reduced sports injuries to less than 1/3 and overuse injuries could be almost halved.
Seksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
Date
2015-03-19Type
Journal articleIdentifier
oai:brage.bibsys.no:11250/279729British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014, 48, 871-877
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/279729