• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Cultural and Social Ethics
  • Intercultural Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Cultural and Social Ethics
  • Intercultural Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

A problem with inclusion in learning disability research

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
McClimens, Alex
Allmark, Peter
Keywords
capacity
consent
ethics
learning disability
research
inclusion

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4090274
Online Access
https://globethics.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969733011404588
Abstract
People with severe learning disability are particularly difficult to include in the research process. As a result, researchers may be tempted to focus on those with learning disability who can be included. The problem is exacerbated in this field as the political agenda of inclusion and involvement is driven by those people with learning disability who are the higher functioning. To overcome this we should first detach the notion of consent from ideas about autonomy and think instead of it as a way to avoid wronging others; this fits the original historical use of consent in research. This allows us to think in terms of including participants to the best of their abilities rather than in terms of a threshold of autonomy. Researchers could then use imaginative ways to include the least able and to ensure they are not wronged in research or by exclusion from it.
Date
2011-09-01
Type
Article
Identifier
SAGE-10.1177/0969733011404588
ISSN-PRINT-0969-7330
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969733011404588
DOI
10.1177/0969733011404588
Copyright/License
© The Author(s) 2011
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/0969733011404588
Scopus Count
Collections
Intercultural Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.