Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCUYPERS,STEFAAN E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-16T18:38:33Z
dc.date.available2022-09-16T18:38:33Z
dc.date.created2020-02-29 00:40
dc.date.issued2019-12-01
dc.identifieroai:scielo:S0120-00622019000300231
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-00622019000300231
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4216036
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT This paper returns to the very concept of moral responsibility. Its focus is not on the conditions but on the nature of moral responsibility. First, it introduces the Strawsonian and ledger conceptions of moral responsibility. Next, it contrasts and compares these conceptions. Finally, it evaluates both conceptions and asks which is the right one. Though this article works toward further clarifying the concept of moral responsibility, its conclusion is open-ended.
dc.format.mediumtext/html
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Filosofía.
dc.sourceIdeas y Valores v.68 n.171 2019
dc.subjectP. F. Strawson
dc.subjectM. Zimmerman
dc.subjectmoral
dc.subjectreactive attitudes
dc.subjectresponsibility
dc.titleTHE STRAWSONIAN AND LEDGER CONCEPTION OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
dc.typejournal article
ge.collectioncode0120-0062
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:16640519
ge.lastmodificationdate2020-02-29 00:40
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid148650
ge.oai.repositoryid4429
ge.oai.setnameIdeas y Valores
ge.oai.setspec0120-0062
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-00622019000300231


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record