Evaluation of the level of community participation in the implementation of the Indigent Exit Strategy as a poverty alleviation measure in the City of Tshwane
Author(s)
Mashego, Thabo RodneyContributor(s)
Plaatjie, S. R.Keywords
CommunityDevelopment
Participation
Empowerment
Indigent
Poverty
338.968227
Economic development -- South Africa -- City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality -- Citizen participation
Social action -- South Africa -- City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality -- Citizen participation
Poverty -- South Africa -- City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality -- Prevention
Community development -- South Africa -- City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality -- Citizen participation
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19611Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the level of community participation employed by the City of Tshwane in the implementation of the Indigent Exit Strategy (IES) as a poverty alleviation measure in Olievenhoutbosch. A total of twenty two respondents participated in the research. The first group was ten beneficiaries and the second was ten that was exited from the database. Lastly, two Social Workers coordinating the programme were interviewed as well.
 The research findings reflect that the IES was not sufficiently rolled out as outlined in the policy and strategy. Capacity building and skills development, assistance to emerging entrepreneurships and other forms of economic development support did not reach out to the broader community as outlined in the IES.
 The study recommends that: the Indigent Exit Strategy interventions should be made accessible to the registered indigent households so that they can clearly know what is expected of them.Development Studies
M. A. (Development Studies)
Date
2015-10-22Type
DissertationIdentifier
oai:uir.unisa.ac.za:10500/19611Mashego, Thabo Rodney (2015) Evaluation of the level of community participation in the implementation of the Indigent Exit Strategy as a poverty alleviation measure in the City of Tshwane, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19611>
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19611
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The participatory development communication approach of Thusong service centres in TshwaneFourie, L.M.; Naidoo, Lynette (North-West University, 2011-05-12)Thesis (M.A. (Communication Studies))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2010.
-
The participatory development communication approach of Thusong service centres in Tshwane / L. NaidooNaidoo, Lynette (2011-05-12)Much discourse on the issue of development communication has focused on participation and its role in improving the lives of developing communities. This line of thought emanates from the theories of Paulo Freire and Martin Buber. Freirean dialogue, which emphasises dialogue and conscientisation emanated from Martin Buber's l-Thou and l-lt relationships and are relevant in this study because these concepts are pivotal in the endeavour to develop grassroots communities. For purposes of this study participatory communication is associated with dialogue, self-reliance, empowerment, the communities' socio-cultural context and strategic communication. In an effort to improve service delivery in the public sector, the South African government resolved to provide communities across South Africa with both information and services through the establishment of Thusong Service Centres. The Thusong concept refers to 'a place to get help or assistance' in Sesotho, and has been the focus of government in carrying out its mandate in respect of development communication in South Africa. This study adopted a qualitative research approach to gather data, to determine how the communication of Thusong Service Centres in Tshwane compare with the normative principles of participatory development communication. This study used purposive sampling and focused on the six Thusong Service Centres in Tshwane. The empirical study comprised document analyses of government policies, semi-structured interviews with senior Government Communication and Information Services (GCIS) personnel and personal observations at the six Thusong Service Centres. An analysis of the communication of Thusong Service Centres with Tshwane communities show that there is inadequate alignment with the theoretical underpinnings of participatory development communication. Against the backdrop of Chin Saik Yoon's four ways of observing participation in development projects, namely, participation in implementation, evaluation, benefit and decision-making, the study indicates that Tshwane communities do not partake in participation in evaluation and participation in decision-making. Furthermore, using Freirean dialogue as a benchmark, it was concluded that Thusong Service Centres do not fully meet the required principles of dialogue. Although the abovementioned results indicate that development communication practised by GCIS at Thusong Service Centres is in the main linear in nature, the study makes practical recommendations on how the normative principles of participatory development communication may be implemented at these centres in order to fast track the development process.
-
Identifying Potential Conflict in Land-Use Planning Using a Values-Centered E-Participation Tool: A Canadian Case Study in Aggregate MiningPhilpot, Simone; Hipel, Keith; Johnson, Peter (2019-01-08)An innovative e-participation tool is used to facilitate the articulation of value-laden assumptions, and to identify key points of likely conflict in an aggregate mining controversy in Ontario, Canada. The expert model developed using ‘Public to Public Decision Support System (P2P-DSS) reflects a perspective that differs significantly from public perceptions in terms of the social values that influence rejection of a permit amendment application. By facilitating two-way communication about values assumptions P2P-DSS generates a novel dataset that can support pro-active conflict management and contribute to a shared understanding between government decision-makers and public citizens.