• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Religious and Philosophical Ethics
  • Interreligious Dialogue
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Religious and Philosophical Ethics
  • Interreligious Dialogue
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Health promotion and care : approaches and trends

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Honeycutt, Richard A.
Keywords
health
healthcare
consciousness
emotions
herbalism
Covid-19 pandemic
religion
science
GE Subjects
Health ethics
Religious ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4273107
Online Access
https://www.dialogo-conf.com/archive/?vid=1&aid=2&kid=170802-15
Abstract
Throughout the history and even prehistory of humankind, efforts have been made to improve health, including the treatment and cure of disease and wounds. These efforts have led to a variety of beliefs and approaches to healthcare, involving a variety of different paradigms. If we examine a representative sampling of these approaches, we can see radical differences in theory and practice. Perhaps inevitably, practitioners of one school of thought have disagreed—sometimes in the extreme—with each other. Scientists, and especially their cheerleaders, have often been guilty of worshiping their own limited views of “science”, an attitude that harms both science and society. Remembering the history of healthcare gives us some background against which to view the current social antipathy among groups having different opinions concerning the Covid pandemic. Greater understanding coupled with humility offers us an opportunity to end the antipathy.
Date
2022-06-30
Type
Article
DOI
10.51917/dialogo.2022.8.2.15
Copyright/License
2021 RCDST. All rights reserved.
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.51917/dialogo.2022.8.2.15
Scopus Count
Collections
Interreligious Dialogue

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.