Author(s)
Eck, NadineKeywords
anti-plagiarism softwareacademic fraud
evaluation
urkund (software)
compilatio (software)
Institut International de Recherche et d’Action sur la Fraude et le Plagiat Académiques (IRAFPA)
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
The conclusions of this article are the result of a study conducted over three years, based on the expertise files that the author established as a scientific collaborator of the current IRAFPA. The use of similarity detection software was systematic for each case. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the absurdity of a persistent belief in universities: that it would be sufficient to call on the services of a computer services company specialising in so-called "anti-plagiarism" software to curb such cases. We will show, by example, what can and cannot be expected of them, and then we will compare the two most widespread in France, Urkund and Compilatio.Date
2023Type
Book chapterISBN
9782889315178DOI
10.58863/20.500.12424/4273122Copyright/License
Globethics PublicationsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.58863/20.500.12424/4273122
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons