Informing Responsible Investment Practices through Environmental, Social and Governance Analysis: A Perspective from South African Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment and Transformation Disclosure
Author(s)
Taute, Delene FrancisContributor(s)
Van Zyl, AnriaStellenbosch University. Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences. School of Public Leadership.
Keywords
Responsible investmentEnvironmental, social and governance inclusion
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment
Investments -- Moral and ethical aspects
Investments -- Political aspects
Investments -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Disclosure of information -- Law and legislation
UCTD
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98664Abstract
Thesis (MPA)--Stellenbosch University, 2016.ENGLISH SUMMARY: This research aims to provide greater insight into responsible investment (RI) practices in South Africa and abroad. Specifically, the research aims to contribute to the fields of sustainability and RI, explore best practices and frameworks informing RI practices, to highlight the obstacles to RI in South Africa, to explore the disclosure of a purposefully selected sample of Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) listed companies, and to improve the disclosure of listed companies in South Africa in order to inform the process of environmental, social and governance (ESG) inclusion in investment decision-making.
 The need for this research stems from the limited body of literature which is available on RI practices in South Africa including good stakeholder engagement and the understanding or interpreting of ESG data. The need for the research is further driven by the fact that, other than publications dealing with levels of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) compliance, there is little deeper analysis on transformation towards improved ESG performance across listed companies that investors can draw on to inform engagement with these companies. In particular, this is the case for the Top 100 listed companies on the JSE. There is also little research that highlights financial, reputational and license to operate risks resulting from transformation towards improved ESG performance.
 The objectives are to increase RI awareness amongst institutional investors like the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) to include ESG consideration in the decision-making process by selecting only those companies actively progressing in the ESG fields; and to prompt companies to focus efforts on ESG disclosure with the aim of improving their disclosure.
 A literature review was utilised to investigate the RI practices in South Africa, the obstacles to RI, and how these obstacles could contribute to a disconnect between ESG disclosure and ESG consideration in investment decisions. This study focuses on two of the most pertinent obstacles to RI as identified in the literature, that is the 1) qualitative nature, poor quality and inconsistency; and 2) incomplete and non-disclosure of ESG data available in the market. An evaluation matrix was utilised to provide greater insight into the ESG disclosure of South African companies (covering the top 40 JSE listed companies for 2013), with specific emphasis on key aspects of social performance, namely B-BBEE and transformation.
 The main findings of this research indicated that the analysis of the impact of ESG issues on company performance is problematic when companies are selective in their ESG disclosure; disclosure is a pre-requisite for quality performance analysis; and the approach to, and absence of, disclosure highlights investment risks that cannot be evaluated. An analysis of the top 40 JSE listed companies’ disclosure was completed to provide a view of the companies’ approach, disclosure and related risks around B-BBEE and transformation.
 Among the group of top-tier performing companies, forty-six per cent listed the topic of transformation and B-BBEE as material issues/strategic objectives and extensive information was provided addressing all B-BBEE elements. These companies expanded on plans to address transformation and B-BBEE within the company as responsible corporate citizens. Eighty-three per cent of companies produced integrated reports and seventy-one per cent produced sustainability reports. Verified B-BBEE certificates (eighty-eight per cent of companies) and scorecards (twelve per cent of companies) were publically available on a listed company level. GRI disclosure indexes were available for fifty-four per cent of companies and the companies reported, in addition to other GRI indicators, on all of the LA and HR GRI indicators selected for this study.
 All of the bottom-tier performing companies briefly mentioned the topic of transformation and/or B-BBEE in their company reports or websites while providing little or no context. Seventy-five per cent of these companies publically disclosed their B-BBEE certificates, however no scorecards were available. No GRI disclosure indexes were available; however, the companies reported on some of the LA or HR GRI indicators.
 The companies in the B-BBEE non-disclosure group did not mention the topic of transformation and/or B-BBEE in their reports or on their websites. Thirty-three per cent of companies produce integrated reports and sixty-six per cent produced sustainability reports. No B-BBEE certificates or scorecards were publically available; however, one company disclosed its verified detailed ownership scorecard on its website. Only eight per cent of companies disclosed a GRI disclosure indexes and reported on the LA or HR GRI indicators selected for this study.
AFRIKAANS OPSOMMING: Hierdie navorsing poog om insig rakende verantwoordelike beleggingspraktyke in Suid-Afrika en in die buiteland te voorsien. Die navorsing is spesifiek daarop gemik om ‘n bydrae te lewer tot die veld van volhoubaarheid en verantwoordelike belegging, om beste praktyke en raamwerke wat verantwoordelike belegging belig te verken, om die struikelblokke tot verantwoordelike belegging in Suid-Afrika uit te lig, om die openbaarmaking van ’n doelbewuste geselekteerde steekproef van maatskappye gelys op die Johannesburgse Effektebeurs (JE) te verken, en om die openbaarmaking van gelyste maatskappye in Suid-Afrika te verbeter ten einde die proses van omgewings-, sosiale, en korporatiewe beheer (OSK) in beleggingbesluitneming te belig.
 Die behoefte aan hierdie navorsing het ontstaan uit die beperkte literatuur rakende verantwoordelike beleggingspraktyke in Suid-Afrika; insluitende behoorlike betrokkenheid van belanghebbendes en die begrip of interpretering van OSK-data. Die behoefte aan die navorsing word voorts gedryf deur die feit dat, anders as publikasies wat handel met gehoorgewing aan Breë-Basis Swart Ekonomiese Bemagtiging (B-BSEB), is daar min diepere ontleding van transformasie vir verbeterde OSK-prestasie in gelyste maatskappye wat beleggers kan gebruik om gesprekke rondom betrokkenheid met hierdie maatskappye te voer. Dit is veral die geval vir die Top-100 gelyste maatskappye op die JE. Daar is ook min navorsing wat finansiële, reputasie-, en lisensie-om-te-hanteer-risiko’s beklemtoon wat ontstaan uit transformasie vir verbeterde OSK-prestasie.
 Die oorhoofse doel van hierdie studie is tweevoudig; om verantwoordelike beleggingsbewustheid onder institusionele beleggers soos die Regeringwerkerspensioenfonds te verhoog om OSK-inagneming by die besluitnemingsproses in te sluit deur slegs die maatskappye te kies wat aktief in die OSK-velde vorder; en om maatskappye aan te spoor om hul OSK-openbaarmakingspogings te fokus op die doel om hul openbaarmaking te verbeter.
 ’n Literatuuroorsig is gebruik om die verantwoordelike beleggingspraktyke in Suid-Afrika te ondersoek; asook die struikelblokke tot verantwoordelike belegging; en hoe hierdie struikelblokke kan bydra tot ’n skeiding tussen OSK-openbaarmaking en OSK-inagneming in beleggingsbesluite. Hierdie studie fokus op twee van die mees pertinente struikelblokke tot verantwoordelike belegging soos geïdentifiseer in die literatuuroorsig; naamlik 1) die kwalitatiewe aard, swak gehalte, en teenstrydighede; en 2) onvolledige en nie-openbaarmaking van OSK-data wat in die mark beskikbaar is. ‘n Evalueringsmatriks is gebruik om insig rakende die OSK-openbaarmaking van Suid-Afrikaanse maatskappye (die Top-40 JE-gelyste maatskappye vir 2013) te voorsien, met spesifieke klem op die sleutelaspekte van sosiale prestasie, naamlik B-BSEB en breëre transformasie.
 Die hoofbevindinge van hierdie navorsing het aangedui dat die ontleding van die impak van OSK-kwessies op prestasie problematies is wanneer maatskappye selektief is in hul OSK-openbaarmaking; openbaarmaking ’n voorvereiste is vir gehalteprestasieontleding; en die benadering tot, en tekort aan, openbaarmaking beleggingsrisiko’s wat nie geëvalueer kan word nie beklemtoon. ’n Ontleding van die top-40 JE-gelyste maatskappye se openbaarmaking is onderneem om ‘n oorsig te verskaf van die maatskappye se benadering, openbaarmaking, en verwante risiko’s rakende B-BSEB en transformasie.
 Onder die groep beste presterende maatskappye (24 maatskappye) is bevind dat ses-en-veertig persent die onderwerpe van transformasie en B-BSEB gelys het as materiële sake/strategiese doelwitte. Die maatskappye het uitgebrei op hul planne om transformasie en B-BSEB binne die maatskappye as verantwoordelike korporatiewe burgers aan te spreek. Drie-en-tagtig persent van die maatskappye het geïntegreerde verslae en een-en-seventig persent het volhoubaarheidsverslae geproduseer. Omvattende inligting is voorsien wat al die B-BSEB-elemente aanspreek en geldige B-BSEB-sertifikate (agt-en-tagtig persent) en -telkaarte (twaalf persent) van hierdie gelyste maatskappye is openlik beskikbaar. ’n Globale Verslaggewingsinisiatief (GVI)-openbaarmakingsindeks is beskikbaar vir vier-en-vyftig persent van die maatskappye waar verslag gelewer word oor die GVI-aanwysers, asook alle arbeidspraktyke en ordentlike werk en menseregte-GVI-aanwysers wat vir hierdie studie gekies is.
 Die groep laagste presterende maatskappye (B-BSEB-bydraer vlakke 5-8) het bestaan uit vier maatskappye en die navorsing het bevind dat die onderwerp van transformasie en/of B-BSEB genoem word in al die maatskappy se verslae of op die maatskappye se webwerwe, wat slegs na wetlike toegewendheid of wetlike vereistes verwys. Vyf-en-sewentig persent van die maatskappye se B-BSEB-sertifikate is beskikbaar, maar geen B-BSEB telkaarte is beskikbaar nie. Geen GVI-openbaarmakingsindekse is beskikbaar nie, maar die maatskappye het egter aangedui dat hulle slegs verslag lewer oor sommige arbeidspraktyke en ordentlike werk en menseregte-GVI-aanwysers.
 Die maatskappye met geen B-BSEB-openbaarmaking het bestaan uit 12 maatskappye en die navorsing het getoon dat transformasie en/of B-BSEB nie in die maatskappye se verslae of op hul webwerwe genoem word nie. Geen B-BSEB-sertifikate of -telkaarte van hierdie gelyste maatskappye is openlik beskikbaar nie, en slegs agt persent van die maatskappye het GVI-openbaarmakingsindekse beskikbaar gestel waar hulle oor sommige van die arbeidspraktyke en ordentlike werk of menseregte-GVI-aanwysers verslag lewer.
Date
2016-03-09Type
ThesisIdentifier
oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/98664http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98664
Copyright/License
Stellenbosch UniversityCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sovereign Wealth Funds and Long-Term Development Finance : Risks and OpportunitiesTordo, Silvana; Arfaa, Noora; Halland, Havard; Gelb, Alan; Smith, Gregory (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-02)Sovereign wealth funds represent a large
 and growing pool of savings. An increasing number of these
 funds are owned by natural resource exporting countries and
 have a variety of objectives, including intergenerational
 equity and macroeconomic stabilization. Traditionally, these
 funds have invested in external assets, especially
 securities traded in major markets. But the persistent
 infrastructure financing gap in developing countries has
 motivated some governments to encourage their sovereign
 wealth funds to invest domestically. This paper proposes
 some basic elements of a conceptual framework to create a
 system of checks and balances to help ensure that the
 sovereign wealth funds do not undermine macroeconomic
 management or become a vehicle for politically driven
 "investments." First, the risks and opportunities
 of domestic investment by sovereign wealth funds are
 analyzed. Central issues are the relationship of sovereign
 wealth fund financing to the budget process and to the
 procurement systems of sector ministries, as well as the
 establishment of appropriate benchmarks and safeguards to
 ensure the integrity of investment decisions. The paper
 argues that a well-governed sovereign wealth fund, with a
 sound mandate and professional management and staffing, can
 possibly improve the quality of the public investment
 program. But its mandate should not duplicate that of other
 government institutions with investment mandates, such as
 the budget, the national development bank, the investment
 authority, and state-owned enterprises. Establishing rules
 on the type of investment (for example, commercial and/or
 quasi-commercial) and its modalities (for example, no
 controlling stakes, leveraging private investment) is one
 way to ensure separation between the activities of the
 sovereign wealth fund and those of other institutions. The
 critical issue remains that of limiting the sovereign wealth
 fund's investment scope to that appropriate for a
 wealth fund. If investments that generate quasi-market
 returns are permitted, the size of the home bias should be
 clearly stipulated and these investments should be reported separately.
-
Investment Law ReformWorld Bank Group (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-10-19)The chief purpose of this handbook is to
 provide government lawyers with a framework to evaluate the
 quality of a country's investment legislation (if it
 exists) and how the legislation relates to its investment
 policy and investment incentives. More specifically, it
 deals with creating new and reforming existing investment
 legislation in developing and transition economies in
 furtherance of the World Bank Group's (WBG's)
 mandate to promote private investment - domestic and foreign
 - in those economies. Handbook appendices contain drafting
 guidelines and checklist of issues that foreign direct
 investment (FDI) laws should include and that countries can
 use when drafting investment legislation. The report is
 structured as follows: chapter one defines key terms about
 investment law reform in an effort to clarify terminology
 and concepts and show how they are related. Chapter two
 examines how widespread investment codes are and explains
 their utility and limitations. Chapter three provides
 recommendations on the structure of investment legislation
 and the key provisions to be included such as definitions,
 investors' guarantees, incentives, framework for
 investment promotion, and transitional provisions. Chapter
 four discusses the fundamental issue of investor entry, in
 particular the conditions under which foreign investors can
 invest including sectoral restrictions, limitations on
 foreign ownership, authorization and screening, minimum
 investment, and performance requirements. Chapter five
 discusses key investor guarantees including fair and
 equitable treatment, national treatment, most-favored-nation
 (MFN) treatment, protection against expropriation,
 guaranteed convertibility and repatriation of profits, and
 settlement of disputes. Chapter six looks at the issue of
 investment incentives, (fiscal incentives in particular) and
 their effectiveness. Chapter seven summarizes key aspects of
 investment promotion to guide legal drafters, should
 policymakers want the investment code to set out the basic
 framework of investment promotion. Chapter eight presents
 the various phases of investment law reform projects, from
 the government's request for assistance with
 legislation to the delivery of a project plan. Chapter nine
 identifies some of the challenges in preparing an investment
 code and the support that governments may need until the law
 is promulgated. Chapter ten discusses the monitoring and
 evaluation (M and E) of investment law reforms, including
 the key indicators involved in a desk review and medium- and
 large-scale projects.
-
Sovereign Wealth Funds in East AsiaWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-03-11)The massive size, rapid growth, and
 high-profile investments of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) in
 the U.S. and elsewhere in 2007 has attracted the attention
 of the media, politicians, regulators, and academics over
 the past year. Some of the SWF investments have been viewed
 as market stabilizing, for instance the substantial equity
 investments in large U.S. financial institutions that were
 recently in financial trouble after the sub-prime mortgage
 crisis. However, there is great suspicion from many
 political and academic quarters that SWFs are politically
 motivated with many SWFs in Asia now at the center of the
 storm. Although SWFs have been in existence for many decades
 worldwide, most SWFs in the East Asia and Pacific Region
 (EAP) are relatively new. The emergence of the SWFs in Asia
 is largely a by-product of the strong economic development
 at East Asian countries and the attendant accumulation of
 foreign exchange reserves, however, there are other types of
 SWFs in the region. The Governments have taken a concerted
 strategy to enhance the returns on these excess reserves.
 The EAP region is an ideal region to take a look at the
 issues surrounding SWFs since Asia has the full range of
 funds from long-established funds to brand new funds; from
 passive portfolio investors to more aggressive strategic
 investors; from resource-backed funds to foreign
 reserve-backed funds; and, based in the largest, most highly
 developed economies to the smallest, poorest economies in
 Asia. Therefore, the objective of this report is to document
 the status of Sovereign Wealth Funds in the East Asia Region
 and to understand the implications of their rapid growth.
 Many developing countries have recently shifted a higher
 proportion of their foreign currency earnings from official
 foreign currency reserves to sovereign wealth funds.
 Sovereign wealth funds have an estimated $600 billion in
 assets under management in developing countries, dominated
 by China ($200 billion held by the Chinese Investment
 Corporation and $68 billion held by the Central Huijin
 Investment Company) and Russia ($130 billion held in the
 Reserve Fund and $33 billion held by the Fund of Future
 Generations). It should be noted that this amount is small
 relative to the total level of reserves held by developing
 countries (estimated at $3.7 trillion at end 2007).