• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Research ethics
  • Research Ethics Professional
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Research ethics
  • Research Ethics Professional
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Maggio, Lauren
Dong, Ting
Driessen, Erik
Artino, Anthony
Keywords
Questionable research practices
Research ethics
Misconduct
Survey
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT
PUBLICATION PRESSURE
ETHICS
INSTRUCTION
PREVALENCE
INTEGRITY

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4290792
Online Access
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/9ca075b5-239c-49fc-a6ed-c89af8ae01a7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0501-x
Abstract
<
p
>
Introduction Engaging in scientific misconduct and questionable research practices (QRPs) is a noted problem across fields, including health professions education (HPE). To mitigate these practices, other disciplines have enacted strategies based on researcher characteristics and practice factors. Thus, to inform HPE, this study seeks to determine which researcher characteristics and practice factors, if any, might explain the frequency of irresponsible research practices.
/p
Method In 2017, a cross-sectional survey of HPE researchers was conducted. The survey included 66 items adapted from three published surveys: two published QRP surveys and a publication pressure scale. The outcome variable was a self-reported misconduct score, which is a weighted mean score for each respondent on all misconduct and QRP items. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, reliability and correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression modelling.
Date
2019-04
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl:openaire_cris_publications/9ca075b5-239c-49fc-a6ed-c89af8ae01a7
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/9ca075b5-239c-49fc-a6ed-c89af8ae01a7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0501-x
Copyright/License
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Collections
Research Ethics Professional

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.