The Tunnel at the End of the Light? A Critical Analysis of the Development of the Tri-Council Policy Statement
Keywords
Tri-Council Policy StatementResearch Involving Humans
Canada
Research Ethics
Democratic Values
Policy Development
Health Law and Policy
Law
Law and Politics
Law and Society
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/scholarly_works/1785https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/ev10a8/cdi_proquest_journals_871273740
Abstract
In 1998, the three major government funding Councils put in place the Tri-Council Policy Statement to regulate all research involving humans in Canada conducted at institutions funded by them. In this paper, we examine the process of developing the TCPS, an historic and very important document in Canada’s research ethics landscape, and the application of the democratic values of legitimacy, transparency, representation, accountability, and community engagement in that process. We argue that efforts were made to ensure basic democratic values in the process, but that these attempts should have been taken farther. This examination is a timely exercise in light of the new draft now being prepared to replace the current version of the Tri-Council Policy Statement. We also consider this ongoing process of establishing a new edition and reflect on lessons to be learned.Date
2011-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca:scholarly_works-2757https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/scholarly_works/1785
https://dal.novanet.ca/permalink/01NOVA_DAL/ev10a8/cdi_proquest_journals_871273740