Protecting whistle-blowers in the public service : a global survey of whistle-blowing laws applicable to the public service sector
Author(s)
Roche, MaximilienKeywords
anticorruptionWhistle blowing
Whistle blowers--Law and legislation
Whistle blowers--Protection
Leaks (Disclosure of information)
international law
public service
واصفات البيانات
عرض سجل المادة الكاملOnline Access
https://doi.org/10.54394/XFJH2510Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of national laws relevant to whistle-blowers in the public sector across 67 ILO Member States. It studies each national law through a selection of indicators derived from reference frameworks and guidance by inter-governmental organizations (e.g. UNODC, OECD) and global civil society organizations (e.g. Transparency International, the International Bar Association). It aims at drawing a picture of each studied member state’s approach to specific questions such as which public sector employees should benefit from a statutory whistle-blower protection, under which conditions and what such protection entails. The study concludes by observing that although enacting national laws protecting whistle-blowers is a relatively recent trend, such laws present a broad diversity of approaches which contrasts with the relative consistency of institutional recommendations.Date
2025-02Type
BookISBN
9789220412916 (print)9789220412923 (web PDF)
9789220412930 (epub)
9789220412954 (html)
DOI
10.54394/xfjh2510Copyright/License
International Labour Organization 2025Attribution 4.0 International
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.54394/xfjh2510
Scopus Count
حاويات
ملفات الرخصة التالية مرتبطة بهذه المادة:
- الموسوعة الابداعية
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as International Labour Organization 2025
مواد ذات صلة
عرض الملفات ذات الصلة بواسطة: العنوان، المؤلف، المنشئ والموضوع.
-
Whistleblowing and Democratic ValuesVandekerckhove, Wim; Lewis, David (The International Whistleblowing Research Network, 2011-12-28)This Ebook is based on the papers presented at the 2nd International Whistleblowing Research conference (2011 at Middlesex University, London). Democracy stands for self-government and human autonomy, for participating in decisions that affect our lives. We often think about democracy only as a political system where we elect those who will make laws that affect us. Yet everyday decisions taken in all kinds of organisations impact on us just as much. Therefore we have to know when decisions taken in organisations are going to affect us in ways that differ from the official organisational discourse. Whistleblowing plays a role in providing that knowledge and thus is a means to democracy. Chapters: Abraham Mansbach draws our attention to this political vision that the act of whistleblowing embodies and represents. In his chapter he examines whistleblowing as ‘parrhesia’, a practice of 'fearless speech' Richard Moberly and Lindsey Wylie examine whistleblowing provisions in codes of conduct of US publicly traded corporations. How do US private sector organisations persuade or even instruct their employees to take up 'fearless speech', and how credible is this? Eva Tsahuridu discusses the management of whistleblowing through codes of conduct but looks at it from an organisational culture perspective. More precisely, she asks what rationale there is for internal whistleblowing from a risk management point of view. She argues that a paradigm shift is taking place. Corporate communication specialist, Bjorn Rohde-Liebenau, makes an important bridge from the internal management of whistleblowing to how this is relevant at the societal level. He puts forward his vision of the role of an ombuds-system in whistleblowing about corruption as a way of showing how internal systems can be made to work for the benefit of both the enterprise and a democratic society. Brown reviews the state of whistleblowing law reform in Australia. In doing so, he offers a valuable analysis of how recognition of the role of public whistleblowing can both secure democracy as well as be democratic in its own right. Indira Carr examines the provisions on whistleblowing in the anti-corruption conventions that the UK has ratified in order to provide the context for a discussion of the Bribery Act 2010 and the accompanying Guidance Document issued by the Secretary of State. Cathy James comments on the protection afforded to workers who make external disclosures under the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA, now Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996). She argues that further regulation is needed for the proper operation of any law or system intended to protect whistleblowers, and how civil society is a vital element in that. Bjørkelo and Matthiesen outline the background to and the impact of their research in Norway. They then describe the link between whistleblowing, retaliation, workplace bullying and health. Their overview of the micro-politics of whistleblowing is well theorised with a typology of retaliation, and a description of common symptoms reported after exposure to reprisals and workplace bullying.
-
Leitfaden für Whistleblower (Useful information for Whistleblowers)Transparency International (Transparency International Schweiz, 2010)In der Schweizer Gesetzgebung sind Hinweisgeber, sogenannte Whistleblower, die auf Missstände in Unternehmen oder in der öffentlichen Verwaltung aufmerksam machen, unzureichend geschützt. Der Leitfaden für Whistleblower von TI Schweiz erläutert die aktuelle Rechtslage, gibt Tipps für potentielle Whistleblower und erklärt, wie bei Meldungen am besten vorgegangen wird und was dabei unbedingt beachtet werden muss. (In Swiss law, whistleblower, who draw attention to abuses in business or public administration, are insufficiently protected. The guidelines for whistleblowers of TI Switzerland explains the current legal situation, gives tips for potential whistleblowers and explains how such announcements should be made and the elements that needed to be absolutely cared about.)
-
Whistle Blowing in HealthcareRolland, Philip D. (Internet Scientific Publications, 2009)Ethical behavior, decision-making and leadership are becoming increasingly important in the healthcare environment where the traditional “service orientation” is being replaced by an almost exclusive “profit orientation.” This fixation on the profit oriented business model has ominous implications for the ethical provision of healthcare services. Healthcare organizations have been in the process of restructuring for over a decade and practitioners, patients and society are questioning unethical practices in managed care including gag rules, lack of full disclosure and compensation plans that reward withholding of healthcare services. There has been very little information published about organizational and administrative ethics in the healthcare literature.Individuals employed by healthcare organizations have a very large diversity in moral ideology reflective of society at large. Under these circumstances it is necessary for the HCO to identify basic and common core values and beliefs. It is from this perspective that we will examine an organization’s responsibility to create, define, and manage ethical behavior for the organization.Key Words: Ethics, ethical decision making, health care administration, institutional leadership, managerial ethics, organizational culture, organizational ethics, health care workers and organizational values.