Stakeholder engagement through empowerment: The case of coffee farmers
Keywords
stakeholder empowermentstakeholder engagement
coffee supply chain
low-power stakeholder
stakeholder theory.
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1689487https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.12208
Abstract
While most studies on stakeholder engagement focus on high‐power stakeholders (typically, employees), limited attention has been devoted to the engagement of low‐ power stakeholders. These have been defined as vulnerable stakeholders for their low capacity to influence corporations. Our research is framed around the engagement of low‐power stakeholders in the coffee industry who are, paradoxically, critical resource providers for the major roasters. Through the case study of Lavazza—the leading Italian roaster—we investigate empowerment actions addressed to smallholder farmers located in Brazil, India, East Africa, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic. We contribute to the theoretical discussion around engagement and empowerment by developing a framework linking together areas of empowerment (defined in the literature) and specific empowerment actions (emerging from our interviews). Our insights shed light on how organizations can design empowerment strategies leading to more effective stakeholder engagement and how empowerment actions can contribute to turn low‐power stakeholders into active business partners. We demonstrate that moving from a traditional competitive view of corporate– stakeholder relationships to a stakeholder theory view based on a logic of cooperative partnerships reinforces the idea that stakeholder engagement and empowerment are both entangled with the value creation process.Date
2018Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:iris.unito.it:2318/1689487http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1689487
10.1111/beer.12208
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.12208
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.
-
Mining Community Development Agreements : Source BookWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-03)The World Bank oil, gas and mining unit,
 in its capacity as a driver for best practice related to
 extractive industry contributions to poverty alleviation,
 has a strong interest in the sustainable development of
 mine-impacted communities. As part of the growing global
 expectation that the extractive industry should contribute
 positively to long-term local development, a discourse has
 grown surrounding a variety of structures and processes
 aiming to deliver development benefits to communities
 affected by mineral resource projects. Examples of these
 strategies include social/community investment programs,
 development forums, community-controlled trusts, development
 funds, and foundations. These strategies may be led by
 government, the companies, the impacted community, or
 through collaborative bilateral or multi sector partnerships
 and agreements. They may be a regulatory requirement or
 negotiated voluntarily in response to mining companies'
 commitment to corporate social responsibility (CSR)
 principles. This document describes some of the main
 considerations and processes regarding the development and
 implementation of these strategies, specifically in relation
 to Community Development Agreements (CDAs). In the last few
 years the World Bank oil, gas and mining unit has worked to
 analyze CDAs within the mining sector as an instrument for
 more sustainable and equitable benefits. This process of
 analysis and research has involved a series of reports by
 the World Bank and external specialists aiming to provide
 technical input on the process, case studies, lessons
 learned, and best practices for CDA development. This report
 builds on previous studies to deliver a knowledge product on
 CDA development with the aim of providing specific
 assistance to the process and delivery of CDAs. This source
 book has been developed from learnings relating to existing
 regulations/ requirements, past experiences, and case
 studies. Volume 2 contains the World Bank Extractive
 Industries Sourcebook, Good Practice Notes: Community
 Development Agreements, and Volume 3 is the Mining
 Community Development Agreements - Practical Experiences and
 Field Studies. Volume 4 is the Community Development
 Agreement - Model Regulations and Example Guidelines.
-
VIDEO: Session 4: Adapting to Water Scarcity and Droughts in FederationsGarrick, Dustin; De Stefano, Lucia; McLeod, Tony; Connell, Daniel; Udall, Brad; Benson, Reed; Hernández-Mora, Nuria; Moore, Michele-Lee; Wheeler, Kevin (Colorado Law Scholarly Commons, 2016-06-10)VIDEO: SESSION FOUR: Adapting to Water Scarcity and Droughts in Federations 8:15 a.m. - 8:50 a.m. Learning from Drought Crisis in Federations: Tools and Institutions for Dealing with Water Scarcity and Sustained Droughts Speakers: Dustin Garrick, McMaster University/University of Oxford Lucia De Stefano, Complutense Universidad de Madrid 8:50 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Panel: The Colorado and the Murray-Darling Moderator: Lucia De Stefano, Complutense Universidad de Madrid Panelists: River Basin Planning: Tony McLeod, MDBA, Murray-Darling Basin Authority Drought Provisions: Daniel Connell, Australian National University Water Markets and Basin Governance: Dustin Garrick, McMaster University/University of Oxford Dealing with Climate Change: Brad Udall, Senior Scientist/Scholar, Colorado State University; University of Colorado 10:45 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Panel: International Innovations to Address Water Scarcity and Drought: Lessons Learned Moderator: Daniel Connell, Australian National University Panelists: Infrastructure and Climate Change: Reed Benson, University of New Mexico Reallocation and Water Markets: Nuria Hernández-Mora, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain Innovation in Transboundary Governance: Michele-Lee Moore, University of Victoria Data Sharing and River Basin Modelling: Kevin Wheeler, University of Oxford