Comparison of different ways of computing grades in continuous assessment into the final grade
Contributor(s)
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'EmpresesUniversitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10251/93831http://hispana.mcu.es/es/registros/registro.do?tipoRegistro=MTD&idBib=27415505
Abstract
[EN] We present the results of comparing various ways of calculating students' final grades from continuous assessment grades. Traditionally the weighted arithmetic mean has been used and we compare this method with other alternatives: arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean and multiplication of the percentage of overcoming of each activi-ty. Our objective is to verify, if any of the alternative methods, agree with the student’s performance proposed by the teacher of the subject, further discriminating the grade be-tween high and low learning outcomes and reducing the number of approved opportunists.Este trabajo ha sido parcialmente financiado por la Universitat Politécnica de Valencia (PIME/2016/A/027/A) “La evaluación pareada como metodología para la evaluación del pensamiento crí- tico de los alumnos”.
Marin-Garcia, JA.; Maheut, J.; Garcia Sabater, JJ. (2017). Comparison of different ways of computing grades in continuous assessment into the final grade. Working Papers on Operations Management. 8(SP):1-12. doi:10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7242
1
12
8
SP
Date
2017-06-07Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:hispana.mcu.es:27415505http://hdl.handle.net/10251/93831
10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7242
1989-9068
http://hispana.mcu.es/es/registros/registro.do?tipoRegistro=MTD&idBib=27415505