• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Ethics in Higher Education
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Educational collections
  • Ethics in Higher Education
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Comparison of different ways of computing grades in continuous assessment into the final grade

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Marin-Garcia, Juan A.
Maheut, Julien
Garcia Sabater, Julio J.
Contributor(s)
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses
Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Keywords
Marks
Grade
Student performance
Higher education
Summative assessment
Classroom learning

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/437518
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10251/93831
http://hispana.mcu.es/es/registros/registro.do?tipoRegistro=MTD&idBib=27415505
Abstract
[EN] We present the results of comparing various ways of calculating students' final grades from continuous assessment grades. Traditionally the weighted arithmetic mean has been used and we compare this method with other alternatives: arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean and multiplication of the percentage of overcoming of each activi-ty. Our objective is to verify, if any of the alternative methods, agree with the student’s performance proposed by the teacher of the subject, further discriminating the grade be-tween high and low learning outcomes and reducing the number of approved opportunists.
Este trabajo ha sido parcialmente financiado por la Universitat Politécnica de Valencia (PIME/2016/A/027/A) “La evaluación pareada como metodología para la evaluación del pensamiento crí- tico de los alumnos”.
Marin-Garcia, JA.; Maheut, J.; Garcia Sabater, JJ. (2017). Comparison of different ways of computing grades in continuous assessment into the final grade. Working Papers on Operations Management. 8(SP):1-12. doi:10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7242
1
12
8
SP
Date
2017-06-07
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Identifier
oai:hispana.mcu.es:27415505
http://hdl.handle.net/10251/93831
10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7242
1989-9068
http://hispana.mcu.es/es/registros/registro.do?tipoRegistro=MTD&idBib=27415505
Copyright/License
Reconocimiento (by)
Collections
Ethics in Higher Education

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.