Keywords
empowermentforgiveness
power
punishment
restorative justice
retributive justice
revenge
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200/3207
Social Psychology
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/4228341f-c9de-4ecf-84e1-3d6d78a74a55https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2254
http://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/4228341f-c9de-4ecf-84e1-3d6d78a74a55
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019588319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019588319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
Abstract
<p
>
We examined the process by which punishment enables forgiveness, testing the proposition that punishment restores a sense of justice to victims, an experience that is empowering. In Study 1 (N = 69), university students received insulting feedback and were given the opportunity (or not) to sanction the offender. In Study 2 (N = 91), participants imagined having the opportunity (or not) to recommend punishment for a person who had vandalized their house. A two-step mediation model (punishment justice restoration empowerment forgiveness) was supported in these two studies. In Study 3 (N = 227), punishment options were expanded to test the role of victim voice in the context of third-party and personal retributive and restorative justice responses to workplace bullying, as well as taking into account revenge as an alternative to justice restoration. When victims had voice, empowerment again played a central indirect role in relations between punishment and forgiveness.
<
/p
>
Date
2017-06-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:research.vu.nl:publications/4228341f-c9de-4ecf-84e1-3d6d78a74a55https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/4228341f-c9de-4ecf-84e1-3d6d78a74a55
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2254
http://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/4228341f-c9de-4ecf-84e1-3d6d78a74a55
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019588319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019588319&partnerID=8YFLogxK