Increasing Access to Justice for Women, the Poor, and Those Living in Remote Areas : An Indonesian Case Study
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
JUDICIARYDIVORCE
FEMALE HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD
CIVIL SOCIETY
JUDICIAL REFORM
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION
INSURANCE
LEGAL PROFESSIONALS
PROSECUTORS
JUDICIAL BODIES
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
EMPOWERMENT
LEGAL MARRIAGE
MEDIA
DIVORCED WOMEN
MARRIAGES
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
DIVORCES
FAMILY LAW
COURT PROCEDURES
JUDGES
GENDER
MARITAL STATUS
FAMILIES
FEMALE
COURT JUDGMENTS
WIDOWS
INITIATIVE
CRIMINAL CASES
WITNESSES
LAWYERS
INHERITANCE
SOCIAL JUSTICE
LEGAL DEVELOPMENT
SERVICE DELIVERY
HUSBANDS
COMPLAINT
JUSTICE
WOMAN
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
COURT BUILDINGS
LAWYER
COURTS
LEADERSHIP
WILL
HUMAN RIGHTS
DISCRETION
COURT HEARINGS
ADVOCACY
LEGAL DOCUMENTS
LEGAL INFORMATION
FAMILY COURT
CRIMINAL
COURTHOUSES
ACCESS TO COURTS
LAWS
PUBLIC PROSECUTORS
LEGAL DISPUTES
TRANSPARENCY
DISTRICT COURTS
POLICE
LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
DEMOCRACY
FEMALE HEADS OF HOUSEHOLDS
SEXUAL ASSAULT
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
JURISDICTION
LEGAL REFORM
LEGAL AID
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10895Abstract
This briefing note outlines the reform process that produced these notable results, a process that began with targeted grassroots empowerment through engagement with PEKKA, an Indonesian civil society organization supporting women headed households. Formal justice sector institutions and local governments subsequently built on those efforts, with support from international development agencies. The note will outline the range of access-to-justice initiatives involving PEKKA, the Indonesian courts, government partners, and international agencies that have contributed to broader policy reform in the access-to-justice field. It will also describe a series of recent access-to-justice policy developments initiated by Indonesian government institutions and a summary of some key results, highlighting how small-scale pilots and research can provide empirical data on which national agencies can draw to strengthen national policy development and planning processes. The concept of access to justice focuses on two basic objectives of a legal system: 1) that it is accessible to people from all levels of society; and 2) that it is able to provide fair decisions and rules for people from all levels of society, either individually or collectively.Date
2012-08-13Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/10895http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10895
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 UnportedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Commercial Court and Enforcement Assessment ToolGramckow, Heike; Ebeid, Omniah (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-04-06)An effective and efficient justice
 system is essential for sustained economic growth. In a
 well-functioning, independent, and efficient justice system,
 decisions are taken within a reasonable time and are
 predictably and effectively enforced, and individual rights,
 including property rights, are adequately protected. Among
 other objectives, the efficiency of the judicial system is
 important for creating a good business climate, attracting
 foreign direct investment, securing tax revenues, and
 supporting economic growth. Research has shown that weak
 contract enforcement, for example, raises the cost of
 borrowing and shortens loan maturities, with a resulting
 negative effect on investment and GDP. Weak court
 enforcement systems have also been linked to late payments,
 which can lead to liquidity issues for companies and
 increase insolvency. Since the publication of the World
 Bank’s World Development Report 2005, the importance of
 well-functioning courts to strengthening the investment
 climate and ultimately to reducing poverty and boosting
 shared prosperity has been brought to the forefront and
 become internationally recognized. Indicators of commercial
 court performance, and business community perceptions of and
 trust in the courts, are a part of the World Bank Group’s
 (WBG) country-level investment climate assessments and its
 influential Investment Climate Surveys and Doing Business
 reports. Court performance has also become an element of
 European Union (EU) and Organization for Economic
 Co-operation and Development (OECD) accession. Helping
 countries to improve commercial court operations and ensure
 improved accessibility and effective delivery of services
 are important components of the development assistance
 provided by the WBG. The Commercial Court and Enforcement
 Assessment Tool has been designed to assist assessment teams
 and client agencies in this effort.
-
In Search of Success : Case Studies in Justice Sector Development in Sub-Saharan AfricaWalsh, Barry (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID) and other donors have long been engaged in legal and judicial reform in sub-Saharan Africa in such areas as legal drafting, strengthening court administration, judicial training, and the empowerment of citizens through a better understanding of the legal system. This has often been done on an ad hoc basis with only limited review of other reform efforts in the region. In order to foster a more responsive approach to justice sector development programs, a collection of case studies was commissioned. One of the more daunting tasks was identifying notable justice sector developments or reforms, which offered specific impacts and which could be examined through both a desk review and field research. Independent of the funding source, the evidence base was not only limited but revealed a need for donors themselves to invest in better data collection, which could then be analyzed and measured against benchmarks or objectives such as improved access to justice. There is a significant need to review and learn from experiences, including controversial ones, in Africa's justice sectors. These case studies are not homogenous largely because their subjects vary and span a wide array of developments that reflect the realities of the region. Each story stands alone and is in no particular order. In the final chapter, the conclusions offered in each story are digested into ideas for future actions. The collection also represents a modest range of stories and it is to be hoped that other cases will be identified and shared. A comparison of experiences of sector-wide programs (SWAPs), for example, could help both donors and governments enhance socio-economic impact. It should be noted that the emphasis in this report is on providing information about positive directions in justice sector development and the ways in which lessons learned might be applied to achieve greater impact in the future. The anticipated value of this collection is that some of the conclusions or actions may be taken up and used to contribute to improvements by those committed to improving the rule of law in sub-Saharan Africa and is in search of 'success'.
-
Uses and Users of Justice in Africa : The Case of Ghana's Specialised CourtsWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This research project involves the tracking of the progress of cases in Ghana's specialized courts. It seeks to provide data that are not usually available for a scientific assessment of the performance of the courts in Ghana. The project, therefore, captures information on the persons and institutions who use the courts in Ghana; what these claimants come to court for; the difficulties they encounter in the process; and the value added by recent court reforms in resolving these problems. Further analysis of this information is then used to make specific and targeted recommendations for improving overall adjudicatory effectiveness. The project is similar to other World Bank studies in many respects. It is premised on a general belief that, almost everywhere, courts struggle to deliver quick, effective, accessible, and efficient justice. The huge disconnect between intention and reality is due to a number of factors, namely, the cost of litigation-an issue which bears directly on access to justice; unprecedented delays in case processing; real and perceived corruption within the courts and increasing uncertainty associated with judges' rulings. Delays, generally defined as unreasonable time spent from case filing and processing to case disposition, stand out amongst the list of problems. There is, therefore, a recognized challenge that the judicial sector in Ghana is currently incapable of providing speedy justice, a critical ingredient for public and investor confidence in the justice system.